PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SIXD vs. BAPR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SIXD vs. BAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jun/Dec ETF (SIXD) and Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (BAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIXD achieves a 7.20% return, which is significantly lower than BAPR's 11.07% return.


SIXD

1D
0.06%
1M
2.71%
YTD
7.20%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BAPR

1D
0.05%
1M
2.18%
YTD
11.07%
6M
12.12%
1Y
20.78%
3Y*
15.40%
5Y*
11.35%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIXD vs. BAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SIXD and BAPR is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2025

0.91

SIXD vs. BAPR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SIXD
BAPR

Technology

36.2%
36.2%

Financial Services

11.9%
11.9%

Communication Services

10.9%
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
10.1%

Healthcare

8.4%
8.4%

Industrials

8.1%
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
4.9%

Energy

3.5%
3.5%

Utilities

2.3%
2.3%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.9%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.8%

Technology

SIXD
36.2%
BAPR
36.2%

Financial Services

SIXD
11.9%
BAPR
11.9%

Communication Services

SIXD
10.9%
BAPR
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

SIXD
10.1%
BAPR
10.1%

Healthcare

SIXD
8.4%
BAPR
8.4%

Industrials

SIXD
8.1%
BAPR
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

SIXD
4.9%
BAPR
4.9%

Energy

SIXD
3.5%
BAPR
3.5%

Utilities

SIXD
2.3%
BAPR
2.3%

Real Estate

SIXD
1.9%
BAPR
1.9%

Basic Materials

SIXD
1.8%
BAPR
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SIXD vs. BAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIXD

BAPR
BAPR Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
BAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
BAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIXD vs. BAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jun/Dec ETF (SIXD) and Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (BAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SIXD vs. BAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SIXDBAPRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.29

0.84

+1.45

Drawdowns

SIXD vs. BAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIXD drawdown since its inception was -4.69%, smaller than the maximum BAPR drawdown of -23.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIXD and BAPR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SIXDBAPRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.69%

-23.91%

+19.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.79%

-2.60%

+1.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.35%

Volatility

SIXD vs. BAPR - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SIXDBAPRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.38%

5.63%

+1.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.38%

11.49%

-4.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.38%

13.12%

-5.74%

SIXD vs. BAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

SIXD has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than BAPR's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

SIXD vs. BAPR - Dividend Comparison

Neither SIXD nor BAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, SIXD and BAPR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, SIXD is cheaper at 0.74% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SIXD is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for BAPR.

SIXD and BAPR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Allianz and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for SIXD and 0.79% for BAPR.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SIXD and BAPR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer