SIVR vs. UNG
SIVR (abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF) and UNG (United States Natural Gas Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - SIVR is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price ($/ozt), while UNG is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Natural Gas. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SIVR returned 14.22%/yr vs -21.38%/yr for UNG. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SIVR charges 0.30%/yr vs 1.28%/yr for UNG.
Performance
SIVR vs. UNG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SIVR achieves a -4.75% return, which is significantly higher than UNG's -7.42% return. Over the past 10 years, SIVR has outperformed UNG with an annualized return of 14.22%, while UNG has yielded a comparatively lower -21.38% annualized return.
SIVR
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- -18.81%
- YTD
- -4.75%
- 6M
- 9.46%
- 1Y
- 86.32%
- 3Y*
- 41.59%
- 5Y*
- 19.07%
- 10Y*
- 14.22%
UNG
- 1D
- 1.70%
- 1M
- 1.70%
- YTD
- -7.42%
- 6M
- -10.84%
- 1Y
- -30.62%
- 3Y*
- -23.83%
- 5Y*
- -24.47%
- 10Y*
- -21.38%
SIVR vs. UNG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIVR abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF | -4.75% | 145.34% | 21.08% | -0.91% | 2.59% | -12.33% | 47.52% | 15.17% | -8.96% | 5.97% |
UNG United States Natural Gas Fund LP | -7.42% | -27.07% | -17.11% | -64.04% | 12.89% | 35.76% | -45.43% | -31.77% | 5.96% | -37.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between SIVR and UNG is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2009 | 0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SIVR vs. UNG — Risk / Return Rank
SIVR
UNG
SIVR vs. UNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) and United States Natural Gas Fund LP (UNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SIVR | UNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 0.95 | +0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.90 | -0.67 | +2.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.12 | -0.97 | +5.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SIVR vs. UNG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIVR drawdown since its inception was -75.85%, smaller than the maximum UNG drawdown of -99.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIVR and UNG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SIVR | UNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.85% | -99.88% | +24.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -45.33% | -43.86% | -1.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.33% | -68.16% | +22.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.33% | -92.49% | +47.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.33% | -93.55% | +48.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.89% | -99.86% | +57.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.83% | -89.96% | +42.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.85% | 30.28% | -9.43% |
Volatility
SIVR vs. UNG - Volatility Comparison
abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) has a higher volatility of 16.37% compared to United States Natural Gas Fund LP (UNG) at 12.64%. This indicates that SIVR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SIVR | UNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.37% | 12.64% | +3.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 59.11% | 52.01% | +7.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 59.76% | 60.61% | -0.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.48% | 64.11% | -27.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.03% | 54.77% | -22.74% |
SIVR vs. UNG - Expense Ratio Comparison
SIVR has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than UNG's 1.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
SIVR vs. UNG - Dividend Comparison
Neither SIVR nor UNG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SIVR and UNG have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SIVR has higher volatility (16.37%) compared to UNG (12.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIVR dropped -75.85% vs UNG's -99.88%.
On 10-year performance, SIVR leads with 14.22% vs -21.38% for UNG. On fees, SIVR is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, UNG has been the lower-risk option at 12.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SIVR has performed better with a 14.22% return vs -21.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SIVR is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 1.28% for UNG.
SIVR and UNG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
SIVR is categorized as Silver, while UNG is Oil & Gas. SIVR tracks LBMA Silver Price ($/ozt), while UNG tracks Front Month Natural Gas. They also come from different issuers: abrdn and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for SIVR and 1.28% for UNG.
SIVR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs -0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SIVR and UNG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer