SIVR vs. SAIC

Last updated Jul 26, 2026

SIVR (abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF) is Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price ($/ozt), while SAIC (Science Applications International Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, SIVR returned 11.14%/yr vs 8.52%/yr for SAIC. Their 0.07 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.

Performance

SIVR vs. SAIC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) and Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIVR achieves a -18.27% return, which is significantly lower than SAIC's 19.45% return. Over the past 10 years, SIVR has outperformed SAIC with an annualized return of 11.14%, while SAIC has yielded a comparatively lower 8.52% annualized return.

SIVR

• 1D: 1.02%
• 1M: 0.49%
• 6M: -43.33%
• YTD: -18.27%
• 1Y: 52.04%
• 3Y*: 32.71%
• 5Y*: 17.88%
• 10Y*: 11.14%
• ALL TIME*: 8.48%

SAIC

• 1D: 2.14%
• 1M: 11.95%
• 6M: 8.81%
• YTD: 19.45%
• 1Y: 5.12%
• 3Y*: 1.52%
• 5Y*: 7.69%
• 10Y*: 8.52%
• ALL TIME*: 12.80%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
SAIC Science Applications International Corporation	$49.96M	$54.61M	$59.26M
SIVR abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF	$43.70M	$48.33M	$88.80M

SIVR vs. SAIC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SIVR abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF	-18.27%	145.34%	21.08%	-0.91%	2.59%	-12.33%	47.52%	15.17%	-8.96%	5.97%
SAIC Science Applications International Corporation	19.45%	-8.73%	-9.04%	13.58%	34.95%	-10.20%	10.81%	39.15%	-15.48%	-8.18%

Correlation

The correlation between SIVR and SAIC is -0.04, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.04
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.07
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.10
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.09
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2013	0.07

The correlation between SIVR and SAIC shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.10 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

SIVR vs. SAIC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIVR

SIVR Risk / Return Rank: 32
SIVR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
SIVR Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
SIVR Omega Ratio Rank: 42
SIVR Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
SIVR Martin Ratio Rank: 24

SAIC

SAIC Risk / Return Rank: 50
SAIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
SAIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
SAIC Omega Ratio Rank: 49
SAIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
SAIC Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIVR vs. SAIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) and Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SIVR	SAIC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.79	0.13	+0.67
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.25	0.47	+0.78
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.06	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.93	0.16	+0.77
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.84	0.29	+1.55

SIVR vs. SAIC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIVR Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is higher than the SAIC Sharpe Ratio of 0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIVR and SAIC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SIVR vs. SAIC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIVR drawdown since its inception was -75.85%, which is greater than SAIC's maximum drawdown of -45.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIVR and SAIC.

Drawdown Indicators

	SIVR	SAIC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-75.85%	-45.92%	-29.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-52.27%	-31.34%	-20.93%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-52.27%	-45.74%	-6.53%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-52.27%	-45.74%	-6.53%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-52.27%	-45.92%	-6.35%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-50.14%	-20.91%	-29.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-47.84%	-12.72%	-35.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	26.36%	17.10%	+9.26%

Volatility

SIVR vs. SAIC - Volatility Comparison

abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) and Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) have volatilities of 10.69% and 10.65%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SIVR	SAIC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.69%	10.65%	+0.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	56.35%	30.83%	+25.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	61.32%	39.72%	+21.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	36.96%	30.41%	+6.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.25%	32.68%	-0.43%

Dividends

SIVR vs. SAIC - Dividend Comparison

SIVR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SAIC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SAIC Science Applications International Corporation	1.24%	1.47%	1.32%	1.19%	1.33%	1.77%	1.56%	1.63%	1.95%	1.62%	1.46%	2.58%
SIVR abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SIVR and SAIC in my portfolio?

SIVR and SAIC have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SIVR or SAIC?

SIVR has higher volatility (10.69%) compared to SAIC (10.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIVR dropped -75.85% vs SAIC's -45.92%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SIVR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.79 vs 0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.