SIVR vs. QQQ
SIVR (abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SIVR is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price ($/ozt), while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SIVR returned 14.22%/yr vs 21.79%/yr for QQQ. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SIVR charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.
Performance
SIVR vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SIVR achieves a -4.75% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 17.57% return. Over the past 10 years, SIVR has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 14.22%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 21.79% annualized return.
SIVR
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- -22.74%
- YTD
- -4.75%
- 6M
- 9.46%
- 1Y
- 85.68%
- 3Y*
- 41.59%
- 5Y*
- 19.07%
- 10Y*
- 14.22%
QQQ
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 0.93%
- YTD
- 17.57%
- 6M
- 17.85%
- 1Y
- 35.82%
- 3Y*
- 26.43%
- 5Y*
- 16.85%
- 10Y*
- 21.79%
SIVR vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIVR abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF | -4.75% | 145.34% | 21.08% | -0.91% | 2.59% | -12.33% | 47.52% | 15.17% | -8.96% | 5.97% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 17.57% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 38.96% | -0.13% | 32.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between SIVR and QQQ is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2009 | 0.19 |
The correlation between SIVR and QQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (10 years) to 0.31 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SIVR vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
SIVR
QQQ
SIVR vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SIVR | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.37 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.90 | 3.01 | -1.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.12 | 11.22 | -7.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SIVR vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIVR drawdown since its inception was -75.85%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIVR and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SIVR | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.85% | -82.97% | +7.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -45.33% | -11.96% | -33.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.33% | -22.77% | -22.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.33% | -35.12% | -10.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.33% | -35.12% | -10.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.89% | -3.33% | -38.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.83% | -32.75% | -15.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.85% | 3.20% | +17.65% |
Volatility
SIVR vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) has a higher volatility of 16.37% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 7.56%. This indicates that SIVR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SIVR | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.37% | 7.56% | +8.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 59.11% | 13.81% | +45.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 59.76% | 17.19% | +42.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.48% | 22.55% | +13.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.03% | 22.38% | +9.65% |
SIVR vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SIVR has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
SIVR vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
SIVR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.39% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
SIVR abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SIVR and QQQ have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SIVR has higher volatility (16.37%) compared to QQQ (7.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIVR dropped -75.85% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 21.79% vs 14.22% for SIVR. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, QQQ has been the lower-risk option at 7.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 21.79% return vs 14.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for SIVR.
QQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.39%, compared with 0.00% for SIVR.
SIVR is categorized as Silver, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. SIVR tracks LBMA Silver Price ($/ozt), while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: abrdn and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for SIVR and 0.18% for QQQ.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SIVR and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer