SIVR vs. HL

Last updated Jul 21, 2026

SIVR (abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF) is Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price ($/ozt), while HL (Hecla Mining Company) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, SIVR returned 10.79%/yr vs 9.48%/yr for HL. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

SIVR vs. HL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) and Hecla Mining Company (HL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIVR achieves a -20.77% return, which is significantly higher than HL's -25.50% return. Over the past 10 years, SIVR has outperformed HL with an annualized return of 10.79%, while HL has yielded a comparatively lower 9.48% annualized return.

SIVR

• 1D: 0.41%
• 1M: -14.32%
• 6M: -36.99%
• YTD: -20.77%
• 1Y: 47.51%
• 3Y*: 31.44%
• 5Y*: 17.05%
• 10Y*: 10.79%
• ALL TIME*: 8.29%

HL

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: -10.46%
• 6M: -46.14%
• YTD: -25.50%
• 1Y: 145.82%
• 3Y*: 35.33%
• 5Y*: 16.77%
• 10Y*: 9.48%
• ALL TIME*: -0.05%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIVR vs. HL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SIVR abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF	-20.77%	145.34%	21.08%	-0.91%	2.59%	-12.33%	47.52%	15.17%	-8.96%	5.97%
HL Hecla Mining Company	-25.50%	291.70%	2.82%	-12.93%	6.99%	-18.97%	91.83%	44.43%	-40.37%	-24.08%

Correlation

The correlation between SIVR and HL is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.72
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.71
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2009	0.67

The correlation between SIVR and HL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SIVR vs. HL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIVR

SIVR Risk / Return Rank: 28
SIVR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
SIVR Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
SIVR Omega Ratio Rank: 37
SIVR Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
SIVR Martin Ratio Rank: 22

HL

HL Risk / Return Rank: 86
HL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
HL Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
HL Omega Ratio Rank: 85
HL Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
HL Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIVR vs. HL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) and Hecla Mining Company (HL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SIVR	HL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.78	2.00	-1.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.24	2.52	-1.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.31	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.91	2.63	-1.72
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.86	5.00	-3.14

SIVR vs. HL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIVR Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is lower than the HL Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIVR and HL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SIVR vs. HL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIVR drawdown since its inception was -75.85%, smaller than the maximum HL drawdown of -97.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIVR and HL.

Drawdown Indicators

	SIVR	HL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-75.85%	-97.92%	+22.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-52.27%	-55.81%	+3.54%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-52.27%	-55.81%	+3.54%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-52.27%	-55.81%	+3.54%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-52.27%	-82.45%	+30.18%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-51.66%	-55.06%	+3.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-47.83%	-69.89%	+22.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	25.61%	29.27%	-3.66%

Volatility

SIVR vs. HL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) is 12.61%, while Hecla Mining Company (HL) has a volatility of 14.84%. This indicates that SIVR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SIVR	HL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.61%	14.84%	-2.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	56.54%	52.19%	+4.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	61.21%	73.35%	-12.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	36.90%	59.45%	-22.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.21%	62.75%	-30.54%

Dividends

SIVR vs. HL - Dividend Comparison

SIVR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HL Hecla Mining Company	0.10%	0.08%	0.81%	0.65%	0.40%	0.72%	0.25%	0.29%	0.42%	0.25%	0.19%	0.53%
SIVR abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SIVR and HL in my portfolio?

SIVR and HL have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SIVR or HL?

HL has higher volatility (14.84%) compared to SIVR (12.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIVR dropped -75.85% vs HL's -97.92%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.