SILJ vs. VOO
SILJ (Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SILJ is a Silver fund tracking the Nasdaq Junior Silver Miners Index, while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SILJ returned 10.08%/yr vs 15.56%/yr for VOO. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SILJ charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.
Performance
SILJ vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SILJ achieves a 6.61% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 10.91% return. Over the past 10 years, SILJ has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 10.08%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.56% annualized return.
SILJ
- 1D
- -5.24%
- 1M
- 2.57%
- YTD
- 6.61%
- 6M
- 16.40%
- 1Y
- 111.95%
- 3Y*
- 47.77%
- 5Y*
- 13.13%
- 10Y*
- 10.08%
VOO
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 5.04%
- YTD
- 10.91%
- 6M
- 10.93%
- 1Y
- 28.04%
- 3Y*
- 22.44%
- 5Y*
- 13.90%
- 10Y*
- 15.56%
SILJ vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SILJ Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF | 6.61% | 183.89% | 6.39% | -5.21% | -15.42% | -23.21% | 33.00% | 57.06% | -27.95% | -5.65% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 10.91% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between SILJ and VOO is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2012 | 0.22 |
The correlation between SILJ and VOO shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (all time) to 0.39 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SILJ vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SILJ
VOO
Basic Materials
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
SILJ
VOO
Financial Services
SILJ
VOO
Consumer Defensive
SILJ
VOO
Communication Services
SILJ
VOO
Consumer Cyclical
SILJ
-
VOO
Energy
SILJ
-
VOO
Healthcare
SILJ
-
VOO
Industrials
SILJ
-
VOO
Real Estate
SILJ
-
VOO
Technology
SILJ
-
VOO
Utilities
SILJ
-
VOO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SILJ vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
SILJ
VOO
SILJ vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SILJ | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.43 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.24 | 3.16 | +0.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.99 | 14.73 | -6.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SILJ | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.05 | 2.39 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | 0.83 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 | 0.87 | -0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.09 | 0.89 | -0.80 |
Drawdowns
SILJ vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SILJ drawdown since its inception was -79.04%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SILJ and VOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SILJ | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.04% | -33.99% | -45.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.71% | -8.90% | -25.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.71% | -18.69% | -16.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.47% | -24.52% | -30.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.06% | -33.99% | -36.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.80% | -0.70% | -26.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.43% | -3.69% | -37.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.06% | 1.91% | +12.15% |
Volatility
SILJ vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) has a higher volatility of 18.69% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 2.84%. This indicates that SILJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SILJ | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.69% | 2.84% | +15.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.24% | 8.90% | +36.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.90% | 11.80% | +43.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.35% | 16.81% | +27.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.24% | 18.01% | +28.23% |
SILJ vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SILJ has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
SILJ vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
SILJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, more than VOO's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SILJ Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF | 1.88% | 2.00% | 7.26% | 0.01% | 0.05% | 0.36% | 1.23% | 1.45% | 1.66% | 0.00% | 0.52% | 2.46% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.03% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SILJ and VOO have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SILJ has higher volatility (18.69%) compared to VOO (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SILJ dropped -79.04% vs VOO's -33.99%.
On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.56% vs 10.08% for SILJ. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.56% return vs 10.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for SILJ.
SILJ has the higher dividend yield at 1.88%, compared with 1.03% for VOO.
SILJ is categorized as Silver, while VOO is S&P 500. SILJ tracks Nasdaq Junior Silver Miners Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for SILJ and 0.03% for VOO.
VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SILJ and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer