SILJ vs. MSTZ

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

SILJ (Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF) and MSTZ (T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SILJ is a Silver fund tracking the Nasdaq Junior Silver Miners Index, while MSTZ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by REX. SILJ is passively managed, while MSTZ is actively managed. Over the past year, SILJ returned 68.80% vs 159.07% for MSTZ. Their -0.26 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. SILJ charges 0.69%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for MSTZ.

Performance

SILJ vs. MSTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SILJ achieves a -12.94% return, which is significantly higher than MSTZ's -30.44% return.

SILJ

• 1D: -3.45%
• 1M: -9.88%
• 6M: -24.25%
• YTD: -12.94%
• 1Y: 68.80%
• 3Y*: 38.59%
• 5Y*: 12.94%
• 10Y*: 3.95%
• ALL TIME*: 2.50%

MSTZ

• 1D: 8.95%
• 1M: 7.38%
• 6M: -24.16%
• YTD: -30.44%
• 1Y: 159.07%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -86.57%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF	$101.73M	$133.33M	$177.41M
SILJ Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF	$79.44M	$79.47M	$126.28M

SILJ vs. MSTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SILJ Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF	-12.94%	183.89%	-15.96%
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF	-30.44%	-38.95%	-94.43%

Correlation

The correlation between SILJ and MSTZ is -0.32, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.32
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2024	-0.26

Return for Risk

SILJ vs. MSTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SILJ

SILJ Risk / Return Rank: 45
SILJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
SILJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
SILJ Omega Ratio Rank: 49
SILJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
SILJ Martin Ratio Rank: 35

MSTZ

MSTZ Risk / Return Rank: 61
MSTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
MSTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
MSTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 68
MSTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
MSTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SILJ vs. MSTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SILJ	MSTZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.19	1.38	-0.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.68	2.22	-0.54
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.28	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.69	2.44	-0.75
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.45	4.53	-1.09

SILJ vs. MSTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SILJ Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is comparable to the MSTZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SILJ and MSTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SILJ vs. MSTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SILJ drawdown since its inception was -79.04%, smaller than the maximum MSTZ drawdown of -99.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SILJ and MSTZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	SILJ	MSTZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-79.04%	-99.38%	+20.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-41.12%	-84.89%	+43.77%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-41.12%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-48.29%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-70.06%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-40.22%	-97.63%	+57.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-41.36%	-94.63%	+53.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	20.08%	45.62%	-25.54%

Volatility

SILJ vs. MSTZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) is 14.89%, while T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) has a volatility of 37.86%. This indicates that SILJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SILJ	MSTZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.89%	37.86%	-22.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	47.55%	134.52%	-86.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	58.44%	150.23%	-91.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	45.12%	169.87%	-124.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	46.34%	169.87%	-123.53%

SILJ vs. MSTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SILJ has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than MSTZ's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

SILJ vs. MSTZ - Dividend Comparison

SILJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.30%, while MSTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SILJ Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF	2.30%	2.00%	7.26%	0.01%	0.05%	0.36%	1.23%	1.45%	1.66%	0.00%	0.52%	2.46%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SILJ and MSTZ in my portfolio?

SILJ and MSTZ have a correlation of -0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SILJ or MSTZ?

MSTZ has higher volatility (37.86%) compared to SILJ (14.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SILJ dropped -79.04% vs MSTZ's -99.38%.

Which ETF is better, SILJ or MSTZ?

On 1-year performance, MSTZ leads with 159.07% vs 68.80% for SILJ. On fees, SILJ is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, SILJ has been the lower-risk option at 14.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SILJ or MSTZ?

Over the 1-year period, MSTZ has performed better with a 159.07% return vs 68.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SILJ or MSTZ?

SILJ is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSTZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SILJ or MSTZ?

SILJ has the higher dividend yield at 2.30%, compared with 0.00% for MSTZ.

What is the main difference between SILJ and MSTZ?

SILJ is categorized as Silver, while MSTZ is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for SILJ and 1.05% for MSTZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MSTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.