SII.TO vs. CLS.TO
SII.TO (Sprott Inc) and CLS.TO (Celestica Inc.) are both stocks. SII.TO operates in Asset Management (Financial Services), while CLS.TO operates in Electronic Components (Technology). Over the past 10 years, SII.TO returned 22.78%/yr vs 44.95%/yr for CLS.TO. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SII.TO vs. CLS.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SII.TO achieves a 24.09% return, which is significantly lower than CLS.TO's 35.52% return. Over the past 10 years, SII.TO has underperformed CLS.TO with an annualized return of 22.78%, while CLS.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 44.95% annualized return.
SII.TO
- 1D
- 2.64%
- 1M
- -6.12%
- YTD
- 24.09%
- 6M
- 29.21%
- 1Y
- 95.63%
- 3Y*
- 58.72%
- 5Y*
- 28.49%
- 10Y*
- 22.78%
CLS.TO
- 1D
- 2.22%
- 1M
- 11.19%
- YTD
- 35.52%
- 6M
- 30.45%
- 1Y
- 223.16%
- 3Y*
- 212.27%
- 5Y*
- 122.50%
- 10Y*
- 44.95%
SII.TO vs. CLS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SII.TO Sprott Inc | 24.09% | 126.73% | 38.44% | 2.73% | -18.97% | 57.52% | 25.86% | 16.40% | 5.75% | -2.27% |
CLS.TO Celestica Inc. | 35.52% | 206.05% | 241.82% | 154.33% | 8.23% | 37.29% | -4.64% | -9.95% | -9.26% | -17.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between SII.TO and CLS.TO is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2008 | 0.17 |
The correlation between SII.TO and CLS.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (all time) to 0.32 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
SII.TO:
CA$4.28B
CLS.TO:
CA$63.66B
SII.TO:
CA$4.14
CLS.TO:
$8.28
SII.TO:
40.09
CLS.TO:
47.51
SII.TO:
0.82
CLS.TO:
0.64
SII.TO:
8.98
CLS.TO:
3.30
SII.TO:
8.07
CLS.TO:
21.70
SII.TO:
CA$476.63M
CLS.TO:
$13.81B
SII.TO:
CA$369.54M
CLS.TO:
$1.60B
SII.TO:
CA$151.96M
CLS.TO:
$1.36B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SII.TO vs. CLS.TO — Risk / Return Rank
SII.TO
CLS.TO
SII.TO vs. CLS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Inc (SII.TO) and Celestica Inc. (CLS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SII.TO | CLS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.39 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.19 | 6.64 | -3.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.77 | 16.31 | -7.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SII.TO vs. CLS.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SII.TO drawdown since its inception was -81.85%, roughly equal to the maximum CLS.TO drawdown of -79.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SII.TO and CLS.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SII.TO | CLS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.85% | -79.32% | -2.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.05% | -31.71% | +1.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.05% | -54.25% | +24.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.38% | -54.25% | +10.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.06% | -79.32% | +31.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.34% | -15.72% | -10.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -50.79% | -28.84% | -21.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.91% | 12.89% | -1.98% |
Volatility
SII.TO vs. CLS.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Sprott Inc (SII.TO) is 12.70%, while Celestica Inc. (CLS.TO) has a volatility of 27.86%. This indicates that SII.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLS.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SII.TO | CLS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.70% | 27.86% | -15.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.96% | 55.27% | -16.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.64% | 71.69% | -26.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.85% | 56.60% | -20.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.11% | 48.83% | -11.72% |
Dividends
SII.TO vs. CLS.TO - Dividend Comparison
SII.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, while CLS.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLS.TO Celestica Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SII.TO Sprott Inc | 1.25% | 1.36% | 2.38% | 3.04% | 2.89% | 1.75% | 1.67% | 0.40% | 0.47% | 0.49% | 0.48% | 0.50% |
Financials
SII.TO vs. CLS.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sprott Inc and Celestica Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SII.TO vs. CLS.TO - Profitability Comparison
SII.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sprott Inc reported a gross profit of 182.55M and revenue of 199.39M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 91.6%.
CLS.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a gross profit of 437.20M and revenue of 4.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.8%.
SII.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sprott Inc reported an operating income of 57.39M and revenue of 199.39M, resulting in an operating margin of 28.8%.
CLS.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported an operating income of 267.70M and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.6%.
SII.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sprott Inc reported a net income of 40.08M and revenue of 199.39M, resulting in a net margin of 20.1%.
CLS.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a net income of 212.30M and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in a net margin of 5.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SII.TO and CLS.TO have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for SII.TO and CLS.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer