PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SII.TO vs. WPM.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SII.TO vs. WPM.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Sprott Inc (SII.TO) and Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SII.TO achieves a 26.56% return, which is significantly higher than WPM.TO's -0.44% return. Over the past 10 years, SII.TO has outperformed WPM.TO with an annualized return of 22.17%, while WPM.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 20.97% annualized return.


SII.TO

1D
-1.07%
1M
-12.04%
YTD
26.56%
6M
32.58%
1Y
102.46%
3Y*
59.40%
5Y*
29.10%
10Y*
22.17%

WPM.TO

1D
-1.07%
1M
-15.56%
YTD
-0.44%
6M
10.42%
1Y
32.64%
3Y*
40.12%
5Y*
24.15%
10Y*
20.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SII.TO vs. WPM.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SII.TO
Sprott Inc
26.56%126.73%38.44%2.73%-18.97%57.52%25.86%16.40%5.75%-2.27%
WPM.TO
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.
-0.44%100.91%25.13%25.20%-1.07%3.20%39.06%47.18%-2.24%8.88%

Correlation

The correlation between SII.TO and WPM.TO is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2008

0.34

Over the past year, SII.TO and WPM.TO have become more correlated (0.59) than their long-term average of 0.34, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SII.TO:

CA$4.37B

WPM.TO:

CA$72.86B

EPS

SII.TO:

CA$4.14

WPM.TO:

CA$3.96

PE Ratio

SII.TO:

40.88

WPM.TO:

40.49

PEG Ratio

SII.TO:

0.84

WPM.TO:

1.09

PS Ratio

SII.TO:

9.16

WPM.TO:

26.54

PB Ratio

SII.TO:

8.23

WPM.TO:

7.88

Total Revenue (TTM)

SII.TO:

CA$476.63M

WPM.TO:

CA$2.74B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SII.TO:

CA$369.54M

WPM.TO:

CA$2.12B

EBITDA (TTM)

SII.TO:

CA$151.96M

WPM.TO:

CA$2.37B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SII.TO vs. WPM.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SII.TO
SII.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
SII.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SII.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
SII.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
SII.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
SII.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

WPM.TO
WPM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
WPM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WPM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
WPM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
WPM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
WPM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SII.TO vs. WPM.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Inc (SII.TO) and Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SII.TOWPM.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.16

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.14

1.07

+3.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.95

2.91

+7.04

SII.TO vs. WPM.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SII.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is higher than the WPM.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SII.TO and WPM.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SII.TOWPM.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.28

0.74

+1.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

0.73

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

0.60

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.13

0.35

-0.22

Drawdowns

SII.TO vs. WPM.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SII.TO drawdown since its inception was -81.85%, roughly equal to the maximum WPM.TO drawdown of -83.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SII.TO and WPM.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SII.TOWPM.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.85%

-83.21%

+1.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.88%

-30.69%

+5.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.88%

-30.69%

+5.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.38%

-39.04%

-4.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.06%

-47.50%

-0.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.88%

-29.12%

+4.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-50.55%

-25.70%

-24.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.33%

11.25%

-0.92%

Volatility

SII.TO vs. WPM.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Sprott Inc (SII.TO) is 11.66%, while Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM.TO) has a volatility of 17.73%. This indicates that SII.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WPM.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SII.TOWPM.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.66%

17.73%

-6.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.65%

37.89%

+0.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.30%

44.43%

+0.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.75%

33.33%

+2.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.12%

35.20%

+1.92%

Dividends

SII.TO vs. WPM.TO - Dividend Comparison

SII.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, more than WPM.TO's 0.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SII.TO
Sprott Inc
1.23%1.36%2.38%3.04%2.89%1.75%1.67%0.40%0.47%0.49%0.48%0.50%
WPM.TO
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.
0.63%0.57%1.05%1.25%1.40%1.05%1.08%1.24%1.75%1.54%1.06%1.48%

Financials

SII.TO vs. WPM.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sprott Inc and Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M20222023202420252026
199.39M
886.69M
(SII.TO) Total Revenue
(WPM.TO) Total Revenue
Values in CAD except per share items

SII.TO vs. WPM.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Sprott Inc and Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%20222023202420252026
91.6%
77.5%
Portfolio components
SII.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sprott Inc reported a gross profit of 182.55M and revenue of 199.39M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 91.6%.

WPM.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. reported a gross profit of 687.49M and revenue of 886.69M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 77.5%.

SII.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sprott Inc reported an operating income of 57.39M and revenue of 199.39M, resulting in an operating margin of 28.8%.

WPM.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. reported an operating income of 665.21M and revenue of 886.69M, resulting in an operating margin of 75.0%.

SII.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sprott Inc reported a net income of 40.08M and revenue of 199.39M, resulting in a net margin of 20.1%.

WPM.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. reported a net income of 572.50M and revenue of 886.69M, resulting in a net margin of 64.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SII.TO and WPM.TO have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SII.TO and WPM.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer