PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SIG vs. METU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SIG vs. METU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Signet Jewelers Limited (SIG) and Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF (METU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIG achieves a 9.70% return, which is significantly higher than METU's -34.42% return.


SIG

1D
-1.63%
1M
18.77%
YTD
9.70%
6M
3.75%
1Y
19.68%
3Y*
17.13%
5Y*
5.20%
10Y*
2.83%

METU

1D
-0.71%
1M
-16.47%
YTD
-34.42%
6M
-31.54%
1Y
-45.28%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIG vs. METU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
SIG
Signet Jewelers Limited
9.70%4.46%-24.32%
METU
Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF
-34.42%-1.01%28.79%

Correlation

The correlation between SIG and METU is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2024

0.25

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SIG vs. METU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIG
SIG Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
SIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIG Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
SIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIG Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

METU
METU Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
METU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
METU Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
METU Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
METU Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
METU Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIG vs. METU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Signet Jewelers Limited (SIG) and Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF (METU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SIGMETUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

0.90

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.54

-0.77

+1.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.24

-1.36

+2.60

SIG vs. METU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIG Sharpe Ratio is 0.34, which is higher than the METU Sharpe Ratio of -0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIG and METU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SIG vs. METU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIG drawdown since its inception was -95.53%, which is greater than METU's maximum drawdown of -61.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIG and METU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SIGMETUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.53%

-61.85%

-33.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.73%

-61.52%

+31.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-57.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-93.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.24%

-58.08%

+31.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.47%

-23.93%

-7.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.86%

34.46%

-21.60%

Volatility

SIG vs. METU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Signet Jewelers Limited (SIG) is 14.22%, while Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF (METU) has a volatility of 20.46%. This indicates that SIG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than METU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SIGMETUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.22%

20.46%

-6.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.06%

54.04%

-18.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.81%

70.96%

-24.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

53.06%

72.35%

-19.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

65.30%

72.35%

-7.05%

Dividends

SIG vs. METU - Dividend Comparison

SIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, less than METU's 4.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
METU
Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF
4.71%3.00%1.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SIG
Signet Jewelers Limited
1.45%1.51%1.36%0.83%1.15%0.41%1.36%6.81%4.47%2.10%1.06%0.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


SIG and METU have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

METU has higher volatility (20.46%) compared to SIG (14.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIG dropped -95.53% vs METU's -61.85%.

SIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.34 vs -0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SIG and METU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer