SIG vs. BCC
SIG (Signet Jewelers Limited) and BCC (Boise Cascade Company) are both stocks. SIG operates in Luxury Goods (Consumer Cyclical), while BCC operates in Lumber & Wood Production (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, SIG returned 1.75%/yr vs 16.55%/yr for BCC. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SIG vs. BCC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SIG achieves a 3.74% return, which is significantly higher than BCC's -6.14% return. Over the past 10 years, SIG has underperformed BCC with an annualized return of 1.75%, while BCC has yielded a comparatively higher 16.55% annualized return.
SIG
- 1D
- -3.01%
- 1M
- 5.37%
- YTD
- 3.74%
- 6M
- -3.41%
- 1Y
- 15.23%
- 3Y*
- 10.83%
- 5Y*
- 9.12%
- 10Y*
- 1.75%
BCC
- 1D
- -0.78%
- 1M
- -7.31%
- YTD
- -6.14%
- 6M
- -9.77%
- 1Y
- -20.71%
- 3Y*
- 0.45%
- 5Y*
- 7.33%
- 10Y*
- 16.55%
SIG vs. BCC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIG Signet Jewelers Limited | 3.74% | 4.46% | -23.85% | 59.64% | -20.96% | 220.69% | 27.22% | -26.28% | -42.19% | -38.94% |
BCC Boise Cascade Company | -6.14% | -37.47% | -4.02% | 106.65% | 1.53% | 62.14% | 37.01% | 59.08% | -38.36% | 77.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between SIG and BCC is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 7, 2013 | 0.38 |
The correlation between SIG and BCC shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (1 year) to 0.49 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
SIG:
$3.45B
BCC:
$2.47B
SIG:
$7.11
BCC:
$2.98
SIG:
12.01
BCC:
23.08
SIG:
0.51
BCC:
0.40
SIG:
1.82
BCC:
1.23
SIG:
$6.83B
BCC:
$6.37B
SIG:
$2.66B
BCC:
$709.89M
SIG:
$601.70M
BCC:
$308.65M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SIG vs. BCC — Risk / Return Rank
SIG
BCC
SIG vs. BCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Signet Jewelers Limited (SIG) and Boise Cascade Company (BCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SIG | BCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.33 | -0.55 | +0.88 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.83 | -0.67 | +1.50 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 0.93 | +0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.51 | -0.70 | +1.22 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.22 | -1.23 | +2.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SIG | BCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 | -0.55 | +0.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 | 0.18 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.03 | 0.40 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.14 | 0.26 | -0.13 |
Drawdowns
SIG vs. BCC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIG drawdown since its inception was -95.53%, which is greater than BCC's maximum drawdown of -67.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIG and BCC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SIG | BCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.53% | -67.67% | -27.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.73% | -29.60% | -0.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -57.12% | -56.47% | -0.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.12% | -56.47% | -0.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -93.23% | -56.47% | -36.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.24% | -54.19% | +23.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.47% | -23.02% | -8.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.53% | 16.80% | -4.27% |
Volatility
SIG vs. BCC - Volatility Comparison
Signet Jewelers Limited (SIG) has a higher volatility of 15.03% compared to Boise Cascade Company (BCC) at 11.06%. This indicates that SIG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SIG | BCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.03% | 11.06% | +3.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.93% | 27.30% | +8.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.85% | 37.92% | +9.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 53.46% | 40.81% | +12.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 65.28% | 41.69% | +23.59% |
Dividends
SIG vs. BCC - Dividend Comparison
SIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, more than BCC's 1.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCC Boise Cascade Company | 1.28% | 1.17% | 4.90% | 6.73% | 5.84% | 7.61% | 4.18% | 3.75% | 5.45% | 0.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SIG Signet Jewelers Limited | 1.53% | 1.51% | 1.36% | 0.83% | 1.15% | 0.41% | 1.36% | 6.81% | 4.47% | 2.10% | 1.06% | 0.68% |
Financials
SIG vs. BCC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Signet Jewelers Limited and Boise Cascade Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SIG vs. BCC - Profitability Comparison
SIG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Signet Jewelers Limited reported a gross profit of 556.50M and revenue of 1.55B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.8%.
BCC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Boise Cascade Company reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.50B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
SIG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Signet Jewelers Limited reported an operating income of 36.90M and revenue of 1.55B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.4%.
BCC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Boise Cascade Company reported an operating income of 27.79M and revenue of 1.50B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.9%.
SIG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Signet Jewelers Limited reported a net income of 31.70M and revenue of 1.55B, resulting in a net margin of 2.0%.
BCC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Boise Cascade Company reported a net income of 17.84M and revenue of 1.50B, resulting in a net margin of 1.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SIG and BCC have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SIG has higher volatility (15.03%) compared to BCC (11.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIG dropped -95.53% vs BCC's -67.67%.
SIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.33 vs -0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SIG and BCC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer