PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SIG vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SIG vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Signet Jewelers Limited (SIG) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIG achieves a 3.22% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 16.45% return. Over the past 10 years, SIG has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 2.43%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 22.07% annualized return.


SIG

1D
-2.09%
1M
4.06%
YTD
3.22%
6M
-0.32%
1Y
8.00%
3Y*
12.46%
5Y*
2.64%
10Y*
2.43%

QQQ

1D
-3.29%
1M
-0.43%
YTD
16.45%
6M
14.99%
1Y
34.88%
3Y*
26.05%
5Y*
16.01%
10Y*
22.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIG vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SIG
Signet Jewelers Limited
3.22%4.46%-23.85%59.64%-20.96%220.69%27.22%-26.28%-42.19%-38.94%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
16.45%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%27.42%48.62%38.96%-0.13%32.66%

Correlation

The correlation between SIG and QQQ is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 1999

0.33

The correlation between SIG and QQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (10 years) to 0.43 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SIG vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIG
SIG Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
SIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIG Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
SIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIG Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIG vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Signet Jewelers Limited (SIG) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SIGQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.35

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.27

2.93

-2.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.61

10.86

-10.25

SIG vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIG Sharpe Ratio is 0.17, which is lower than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIG and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SIG vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIG drawdown since its inception was -95.53%, which is greater than QQQ's maximum drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIG and QQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SIGQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.53%

-82.97%

-12.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.73%

-11.96%

-17.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-57.12%

-22.77%

-34.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.12%

-35.12%

-22.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-93.23%

-35.12%

-58.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.60%

-4.25%

-26.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.46%

-32.73%

+1.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.12%

3.22%

+9.90%

Volatility

SIG vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

Signet Jewelers Limited (SIG) has a higher volatility of 12.76% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 9.17%. This indicates that SIG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SIGQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.76%

9.17%

+3.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.79%

14.57%

+20.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.09%

17.96%

+28.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

53.07%

22.69%

+30.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

65.31%

22.42%

+42.89%

Dividends

SIG vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

SIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.54%, more than QQQ's 0.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.43%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%
SIG
Signet Jewelers Limited
1.54%1.51%1.36%0.83%1.15%0.41%1.36%6.81%4.47%2.10%1.06%0.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


SIG and QQQ have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SIG has higher volatility (12.76%) compared to QQQ (9.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIG dropped -95.53% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SIG and QQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer