PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SIEPX vs. SMICX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SIEPX vs. SMICX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Saratoga International Equity Portfolio (SIEPX) and Saratoga Moderately Conservative Balanced Allocation Portfolio (SMICX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIEPX achieves a 17.33% return, which is significantly higher than SMICX's 3.00% return.


SIEPX

1D
3.19%
1M
1.81%
6M
12.56%
YTD
17.33%
1Y
27.80%
3Y*
17.70%
5Y*
9.01%
10Y*
7.47%
ALL TIME*
3.11%

SMICX

1D
1.07%
1M
-1.90%
6M
1.71%
YTD
3.00%
1Y
8.19%
3Y*
10.18%
5Y*
6.10%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
6.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

SIEPX vs. SMICX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SIEPX
Saratoga International Equity Portfolio
17.33%31.89%5.25%14.80%-21.85%19.33%5.87%19.77%-23.89%0.09%
SMICX
Saratoga Moderately Conservative Balanced Allocation Portfolio
3.00%12.07%11.02%12.83%-9.82%11.85%9.22%16.62%-7.61%0.00%

Correlation

The correlation between SIEPX and SMICX is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 29, 2017

0.76

The correlation between SIEPX and SMICX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SIEPX vs. SMICX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SIEPX
SIEPX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
SIEPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIEPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIEPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
SIEPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIEPX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

SMICX
SMICX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
SMICX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMICX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMICX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
SMICX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMICX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SIEPX vs. SMICX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Saratoga International Equity Portfolio (SIEPX) and Saratoga Moderately Conservative Balanced Allocation Portfolio (SMICX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SIEPXSMICXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.14

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.32

1.13

+1.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.53

4.32

+4.21

SIEPX vs. SMICX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIEPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is higher than the SMICX Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIEPX and SMICX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SIEPX vs. SMICX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIEPX drawdown since its inception was -62.81%, which is greater than SMICX's maximum drawdown of -22.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIEPX and SMICX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SIEPXSMICXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.81%

-22.85%

-39.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.41%

-6.64%

-4.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.63%

-11.42%

-4.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.31%

-14.24%

-21.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.41%

+3.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.93%

-3.36%

-20.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.11%

1.73%

+1.38%

Volatility

SIEPX vs. SMICX - Volatility Comparison

Saratoga International Equity Portfolio (SIEPX) has a higher volatility of 5.60% compared to Saratoga Moderately Conservative Balanced Allocation Portfolio (SMICX) at 2.88%. This indicates that SIEPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMICX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SIEPXSMICXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.60%

2.88%

+2.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.17%

7.64%

+6.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.20%

9.40%

+6.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.69%

9.99%

+6.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.42%

11.12%

+6.30%

SIEPX vs. SMICX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SIEPX has a 2.47% expense ratio, which is higher than SMICX's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

SIEPX vs. SMICX - Dividend Comparison

SIEPX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMICX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.81%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SIEPX
Saratoga International Equity Portfolio
0.00%0.00%0.71%0.83%0.31%0.41%1.79%1.97%0.58%0.03%0.63%0.15%
SMICX
Saratoga Moderately Conservative Balanced Allocation Portfolio
10.81%11.14%4.00%0.87%7.81%11.59%1.39%3.45%2.95%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SIEPX and SMICX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SIEPX has higher volatility (5.60%) compared to SMICX (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIEPX dropped -62.81% vs SMICX's -22.85%.

SIEPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SIEPX and SMICX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer