SIEPX vs. SIBPX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

SIEPX (Saratoga International Equity Portfolio) and SIBPX (Saratoga Investment Quality Bond Portfolio) are both mutual funds - SIEPX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by Saratoga, while SIBPX is a Short-Term Bond fund managed by Saratoga. Over the past 5 years, SIEPX returned 8.51%/yr vs 1.10%/yr for SIBPX. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SIEPX charges 2.47%/yr vs 1.54%/yr for SIBPX.

Performance

SIEPX vs. SIBPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Saratoga International Equity Portfolio (SIEPX) and Saratoga Investment Quality Bond Portfolio (SIBPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIEPX achieves a 15.65% return, which is significantly higher than SIBPX's -0.85% return.

SIEPX

• 1D: 1.29%
• 1M: 3.73%
• YTD: 15.65%
• 6M: 15.96%
• 1Y: 28.60%
• 3Y*: 18.73%
• 5Y*: 8.51%
• 10Y*: 7.35%

SIBPX

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: 0.52%
• YTD: -0.85%
• 6M: -0.75%
• 1Y: 2.48%
• 3Y*: 3.05%
• 5Y*: 1.10%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIEPX vs. SIBPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SIEPX Saratoga International Equity Portfolio	15.65%	31.89%	5.25%	14.80%	-21.85%	19.33%	5.87%	19.77%	-23.89%	8.43%
SIBPX Saratoga Investment Quality Bond Portfolio	-0.85%	6.50%	0.78%	2.90%	-2.51%	-1.73%	3.34%	3.84%	-0.72%	-0.13%

Correlation

The correlation between SIEPX and SIBPX is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.40
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.29
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.21
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2017	0.10

Over the past year, SIEPX and SIBPX have become more correlated (0.40) than their long-term average of 0.10, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

SIEPX vs. SIBPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIEPX

SIEPX Risk / Return Rank: 44
SIEPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
SIEPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
SIEPX Omega Ratio Rank: 45
SIEPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
SIEPX Martin Ratio Rank: 46

SIBPX

SIBPX Risk / Return Rank: 8
SIBPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
SIBPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
SIBPX Omega Ratio Rank: 8
SIBPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
SIBPX Martin Ratio Rank: 8

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIEPX vs. SIBPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Saratoga International Equity Portfolio (SIEPX) and Saratoga Investment Quality Bond Portfolio (SIBPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SIEPX	SIBPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.80	0.67	+1.13
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.50	1.00	+1.51
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.12	+0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.44	0.79	+1.66
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.06	2.15	+6.91

SIEPX vs. SIBPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIEPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is higher than the SIBPX Sharpe Ratio of 0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIEPX and SIBPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SIEPX vs. SIBPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIEPX drawdown since its inception was -62.81%, which is greater than SIBPX's maximum drawdown of -5.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIEPX and SIBPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SIEPX	SIBPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.81%	-5.57%	-57.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.41%	-3.30%	-8.11%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.63%	-4.28%	-11.35%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.31%	-4.74%	-30.57%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.47%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-2.18%	+2.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.01%	-1.71%	-22.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.07%	1.21%	+1.86%

Volatility

SIEPX vs. SIBPX - Volatility Comparison

Saratoga International Equity Portfolio (SIEPX) has a higher volatility of 5.70% compared to Saratoga Investment Quality Bond Portfolio (SIBPX) at 1.25%. This indicates that SIEPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SIBPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SIEPX	SIBPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.70%	1.25%	+4.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.07%	2.77%	+10.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.46%	3.87%	+11.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.55%	3.39%	+13.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.66%	2.76%	+14.90%

SIEPX vs. SIBPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SIEPX has a 2.47% expense ratio, which is higher than SIBPX's 1.54% expense ratio.

Dividends

SIEPX vs. SIBPX - Dividend Comparison

SIEPX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SIBPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SIBPX Saratoga Investment Quality Bond Portfolio	2.04%	2.24%	2.31%	1.54%	0.14%	1.39%	0.58%	0.99%	1.21%	1.03%	0.00%	0.00%
SIEPX Saratoga International Equity Portfolio	0.00%	0.00%	0.71%	0.83%	0.31%	0.41%	1.79%	1.97%	0.58%	0.03%	0.63%	0.15%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SIEPX and SIBPX in my portfolio?

SIEPX and SIBPX have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SIEPX or SIBPX?

SIEPX has higher volatility (5.70%) compared to SIBPX (1.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIEPX dropped -62.81% vs SIBPX's -5.57%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SIEPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.