PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SHYM vs. DJP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SHYM vs. DJP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Short Duration High Yield Muni Active ETF (SHYM) and iPath Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return ETN (DJP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHYM achieves a 2.65% return, which is significantly lower than DJP's 19.91% return.


SHYM

1D
0.09%
1M
0.56%
6M
2.19%
YTD
2.65%
1Y
5.27%
3Y*
5.80%
5Y*
0.74%
10Y*

DJP

1D
-0.35%
1M
-1.94%
6M
16.75%
YTD
19.91%
1Y
29.52%
3Y*
13.06%
5Y*
10.88%
10Y*
6.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SHYM vs. DJP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SHYM
iShares Short Duration High Yield Muni Active ETF
2.65%2.58%6.99%9.67%-15.96%6.71%
DJP
iPath Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return ETN
19.91%17.20%5.59%-9.85%17.46%17.57%

Correlation

The correlation between SHYM and DJP is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2021

-0.02

The correlation between SHYM and DJP shifts across timeframes, from -0.22 (1 year) to -0.02 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SHYM vs. DJP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SHYM
SHYM Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
SHYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHYM Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
SHYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHYM Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

DJP
DJP Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
DJP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DJP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
DJP Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
DJP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
DJP Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SHYM vs. DJP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Short Duration High Yield Muni Active ETF (SHYM) and iPath Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return ETN (DJP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SHYMDJPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.29

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.06

1.88

+0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.16

6.29

+1.86

SHYM vs. DJP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHYM Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is comparable to the DJP Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHYM and DJP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SHYM vs. DJP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHYM drawdown since its inception was -22.55%, smaller than the maximum DJP drawdown of -78.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHYM and DJP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SHYMDJPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.55%

-78.35%

+55.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.23%

-16.42%

+14.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.06%

-16.42%

+8.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.55%

-28.98%

+6.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.27%

-38.33%

+38.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.63%

-50.79%

+44.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.66%

4.89%

-4.23%

Volatility

SHYM vs. DJP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Short Duration High Yield Muni Active ETF (SHYM) is 0.49%, while iPath Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return ETN (DJP) has a volatility of 4.94%. This indicates that SHYM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DJP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SHYMDJPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.49%

4.94%

-4.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.82%

16.79%

-14.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.84%

19.32%

-16.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.06%

18.98%

-11.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.88%

17.04%

-10.16%

SHYM vs. DJP - Expense Ratio Comparison

SHYM has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than DJP's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

SHYM vs. DJP - Dividend Comparison

SHYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.28%, while DJP has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
DJP
iPath Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SHYM
iShares Short Duration High Yield Muni Active ETF
4.28%4.55%4.35%4.35%4.01%2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


SHYM and DJP have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DJP has higher volatility (4.94%) compared to SHYM (0.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHYM dropped -22.55% vs DJP's -78.35%.

On 5-year performance, DJP leads with 10.88% vs 0.74% for SHYM. On fees, SHYM is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, SHYM has been the lower-risk option at 0.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DJP has performed better with a 10.88% return vs 0.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SHYM is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for DJP.

SHYM has the higher dividend yield at 4.28%, compared with 0.00% for DJP.

SHYM is categorized as High Yield Muni, while DJP is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Barclays Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SHYM and 0.70% for DJP.

SHYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SHYM and DJP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer