SHW vs. MRSH
SHW (The Sherwin-Williams Company) and MRSH (Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc) are both stocks. SHW operates in Specialty Chemicals (Basic Materials), while MRSH operates in Insurance Brokers (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, SHW returned 13.58%/yr vs 11.75%/yr for MRSH. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SHW vs. MRSH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SHW achieves a -1.61% return, which is significantly higher than MRSH's -8.15% return. Over the past 10 years, SHW has outperformed MRSH with an annualized return of 13.58%, while MRSH has yielded a comparatively lower 11.75% annualized return.
SHW
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 6.01%
- YTD
- -1.61%
- 6M
- -3.00%
- 1Y
- -4.65%
- 3Y*
- 9.64%
- 5Y*
- 3.70%
- 10Y*
- 13.58%
MRSH
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 4.74%
- YTD
- -8.15%
- 6M
- -8.49%
- 1Y
- -20.92%
- 3Y*
- -0.08%
- 5Y*
- 5.55%
- 10Y*
- 11.75%
SHW vs. MRSH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHW The Sherwin-Williams Company | -1.61% | -3.83% | 9.90% | 32.73% | -31.96% | 44.90% | 27.05% | 49.70% | -3.23% | 54.11% |
MRSH Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc | -8.15% | -11.26% | 13.75% | 16.15% | -3.45% | 50.83% | 6.86% | 42.33% | -0.14% | 22.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between SHW and MRSH is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 1987 | 0.37 |
The correlation between SHW and MRSH shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (1 year) to 0.43 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
SHW:
$78.72B
MRSH:
$81.98B
SHW:
$10.42
MRSH:
$7.99
SHW:
30.45
MRSH:
21.11
SHW:
2.96
MRSH:
2.46
SHW:
3.31
MRSH:
3.01
SHW:
17.77
MRSH:
5.54
SHW:
$23.94B
MRSH:
$27.52B
SHW:
$11.76B
MRSH:
$11.66B
SHW:
$4.29B
MRSH:
$6.68B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SHW vs. MRSH — Risk / Return Rank
SHW
MRSH
SHW vs. MRSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc (MRSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SHW | MRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 0.85 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.47 | -0.80 | +0.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.99 | -1.40 | +0.41 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SHW vs. MRSH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SHW drawdown since its inception was -52.02%, smaller than the maximum MRSH drawdown of -67.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHW and MRSH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SHW | MRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.02% | -67.46% | +15.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.36% | -27.01% | +5.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.69% | -34.36% | +8.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.46% | -34.36% | -8.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.46% | -35.80% | -6.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.53% | -29.62% | +10.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.63% | -17.41% | +5.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.28% | 15.50% | -5.22% |
Volatility
SHW vs. MRSH - Volatility Comparison
The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) has a higher volatility of 9.00% compared to Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc (MRSH) at 6.91%. This indicates that SHW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MRSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SHW | MRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.00% | 6.91% | +2.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.26% | 19.10% | +0.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.46% | 23.47% | +1.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.27% | 20.20% | +6.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.58% | 20.94% | +5.64% |
Dividends
SHW vs. MRSH - Dividend Comparison
SHW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, less than MRSH's 2.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MRSH Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc | 2.13% | 1.85% | 1.44% | 1.37% | 1.36% | 1.15% | 1.57% | 1.56% | 1.98% | 1.76% | 1.92% | 2.13% |
SHW The Sherwin-Williams Company | 1.00% | 0.98% | 0.84% | 0.78% | 1.01% | 0.62% | 0.73% | 0.77% | 0.87% | 0.83% | 1.25% | 1.03% |
Financials
SHW vs. MRSH - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Sherwin-Williams Company and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SHW vs. MRSH - Profitability Comparison
SHW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Sherwin-Williams Company reported a gross profit of 2.78B and revenue of 5.67B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.1%.
MRSH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc reported a gross profit of 3.47B and revenue of 7.60B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.6%.
SHW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Sherwin-Williams Company reported an operating income of 810.90M and revenue of 5.67B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.3%.
MRSH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc reported an operating income of 1.75B and revenue of 7.60B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.1%.
SHW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Sherwin-Williams Company reported a net income of 534.70M and revenue of 5.67B, resulting in a net margin of 9.4%.
MRSH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc reported a net income of 1.15B and revenue of 7.60B, resulting in a net margin of 15.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SHW and MRSH have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SHW has higher volatility (9.00%) compared to MRSH (6.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHW dropped -52.02% vs MRSH's -67.46%.
SHW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.40 vs -0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SHW and MRSH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer