SHW vs. GHM
SHW (The Sherwin-Williams Company) and GHM (Graham Corporation) are both stocks. SHW operates in Specialty Chemicals (Basic Materials), while GHM operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, SHW returned 13.58%/yr vs 20.77%/yr for GHM. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SHW vs. GHM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SHW achieves a -1.61% return, which is significantly lower than GHM's 61.75% return. Over the past 10 years, SHW has underperformed GHM with an annualized return of 13.58%, while GHM has yielded a comparatively higher 20.77% annualized return.
SHW
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 3.85%
- YTD
- -1.61%
- 6M
- -3.00%
- 1Y
- -10.09%
- 3Y*
- 9.64%
- 5Y*
- 3.70%
- 10Y*
- 13.58%
GHM
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- 1.82%
- YTD
- 61.75%
- 6M
- 65.04%
- 1Y
- 121.09%
- 3Y*
- 99.93%
- 5Y*
- 49.12%
- 10Y*
- 20.77%
SHW vs. GHM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHW The Sherwin-Williams Company | -1.61% | -3.83% | 9.90% | 32.73% | -31.96% | 44.90% | 27.05% | 49.70% | -3.23% | 54.11% |
GHM Graham Corporation | 61.75% | 44.43% | 134.42% | 97.19% | -22.67% | -15.50% | -28.39% | -2.28% | 10.81% | -3.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between SHW and GHM is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 1992 | 0.18 |
The correlation between SHW and GHM shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (all time) to 0.28 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
SHW:
$78.72B
GHM:
$1.16B
SHW:
$10.42
GHM:
$1.12
SHW:
30.45
GHM:
92.39
SHW:
2.96
GHM:
0.31
SHW:
3.31
GHM:
4.71
SHW:
17.77
GHM:
8.25
SHW:
$23.94B
GHM:
$245.29M
SHW:
$11.76B
GHM:
$57.75M
SHW:
$4.29B
GHM:
$14.76M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SHW vs. GHM — Risk / Return Rank
SHW
GHM
SHW vs. GHM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) and Graham Corporation (GHM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SHW | GHM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.35 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.47 | 6.69 | -7.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.99 | 16.23 | -17.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SHW vs. GHM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SHW drawdown since its inception was -52.02%, smaller than the maximum GHM drawdown of -86.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHW and GHM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SHW | GHM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.02% | -86.11% | +34.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.36% | -18.21% | -3.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.69% | -46.46% | +20.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.46% | -53.16% | +10.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.46% | -74.83% | +32.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.53% | -3.77% | -15.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.63% | -47.38% | +35.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.28% | 7.49% | +2.79% |
Volatility
SHW vs. GHM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) is 9.00%, while Graham Corporation (GHM) has a volatility of 19.90%. This indicates that SHW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GHM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SHW | GHM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.00% | 19.90% | -10.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.26% | 39.23% | -19.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.46% | 52.36% | -26.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.27% | 49.38% | -23.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.58% | 45.21% | -18.63% |
Dividends
SHW vs. GHM - Dividend Comparison
SHW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, while GHM has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GHM Graham Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.54% | 2.90% | 1.92% | 1.66% | 1.72% | 1.63% | 1.90% |
SHW The Sherwin-Williams Company | 1.00% | 0.98% | 0.84% | 0.78% | 1.01% | 0.62% | 0.73% | 0.77% | 0.87% | 0.83% | 1.25% | 1.03% |
Financials
SHW vs. GHM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Sherwin-Williams Company and Graham Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SHW vs. GHM - Profitability Comparison
SHW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Sherwin-Williams Company reported a gross profit of 2.78B and revenue of 5.67B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.1%.
GHM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Graham Corporation reported a gross profit of 15.69M and revenue of 67.08M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.4%.
SHW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Sherwin-Williams Company reported an operating income of 810.90M and revenue of 5.67B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.3%.
GHM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Graham Corporation reported an operating income of 1.72M and revenue of 67.08M, resulting in an operating margin of 2.6%.
SHW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Sherwin-Williams Company reported a net income of 534.70M and revenue of 5.67B, resulting in a net margin of 9.4%.
GHM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Graham Corporation reported a net income of 1.97M and revenue of 67.08M, resulting in a net margin of 2.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SHW and GHM have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GHM has higher volatility (19.90%) compared to SHW (9.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHW dropped -52.02% vs GHM's -86.11%.
GHM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs -0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SHW and GHM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer