SHUS vs. VFMV
Compare and contrast key facts about Syntax Stratified U.S. Total Market Hedged ETF (SHUS) and Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV).
SHUS and VFMV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SHUS is an actively managed fund by Syntax Advisors. It was launched on Jun 15, 2021. VFMV is an actively managed fund by Vanguard. It was launched on Feb 13, 2018.
Performance
SHUS vs. VFMV - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SHUS vs. VFMV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SHUS Syntax Stratified U.S. Total Market Hedged ETF | 0.99% | 10.89% | -2.65% |
VFMV Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF | 2.55% | 10.52% | -0.44% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SHUS achieves a 0.99% return, which is significantly lower than VFMV's 2.55% return.
SHUS
- 1D
- 1.31%
- 1M
- -5.74%
- YTD
- 0.99%
- 6M
- 2.29%
- 1Y
- 11.39%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VFMV
- 1D
- 1.45%
- 1M
- -4.47%
- YTD
- 2.55%
- 6M
- 2.66%
- 1Y
- 7.33%
- 3Y*
- 12.70%
- 5Y*
- 9.24%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SHUS vs. VFMV - Expense Ratio Comparison
SHUS has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than VFMV's 0.13% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SHUS vs. VFMV — Risk / Return Rank
SHUS
VFMV
SHUS vs. VFMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Syntax Stratified U.S. Total Market Hedged ETF (SHUS) and Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SHUS | VFMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.86 | 0.60 | +0.26 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.27 | 0.90 | +0.37 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.13 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.34 | 0.87 | +0.48 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.27 | 4.02 | +1.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SHUS | VFMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 | 0.60 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.65 | -0.19 |
Correlation
The correlation between SHUS and VFMV is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SHUS vs. VFMV - Dividend Comparison
SHUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, less than VFMV's 2.04% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHUS Syntax Stratified U.S. Total Market Hedged ETF | 1.36% | 1.37% | 0.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VFMV Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF | 2.04% | 2.12% | 1.46% | 2.20% | 2.08% | 1.31% | 2.14% | 2.43% | 2.29% |
Drawdowns
SHUS vs. VFMV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SHUS drawdown since its inception was -14.09%, smaller than the maximum VFMV drawdown of -33.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHUS and VFMV.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SHUS | VFMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.09% | -33.64% | +19.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.12% | -9.63% | +0.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.74% | -4.59% | -1.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.76% | -3.69% | +0.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.32% | 2.07% | +0.25% |
Volatility
SHUS vs. VFMV - Volatility Comparison
Syntax Stratified U.S. Total Market Hedged ETF (SHUS) and Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV) have volatilities of 3.54% and 3.44%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SHUS | VFMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.54% | 3.44% | +0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.45% | 6.62% | +0.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.38% | 12.31% | +1.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.94% | 11.77% | +1.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.94% | 14.35% | -1.41% |