SHUS vs. VFMV

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SHUS (Syntax Stratified U.S. Total Market Hedged ETF) and VFMV (Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SHUS is a Hedge Fund fund actively managed by Syntax Advisors, while VFMV is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Vanguard. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SHUS returned 17.10% vs 13.05% for VFMV. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SHUS charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for VFMV.

Performance

SHUS vs. VFMV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Syntax Stratified U.S. Total Market Hedged ETF (SHUS) and Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SHUS having a 8.58% return and VFMV slightly lower at 8.53%.

SHUS

• 1D: -0.31%
• 1M: 3.21%
• YTD: 8.58%
• 6M: 8.70%
• 1Y: 17.10%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VFMV

• 1D: -0.14%
• 1M: 1.30%
• YTD: 8.53%
• 6M: 8.37%
• 1Y: 13.05%
• 3Y*: 14.70%
• 5Y*: 9.82%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SHUS vs. VFMV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SHUS Syntax Stratified U.S. Total Market Hedged ETF	8.58%	10.89%	-2.65%
VFMV Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF	8.53%	10.52%	-0.44%

Correlation

The correlation between SHUS and VFMV is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2024	0.84

The correlation between SHUS and VFMV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

SHUS vs. VFMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SHUS	VFMV
Technology	17.8%	25.1%
Consumer Cyclical	13.0%	6.9%
Consumer Defensive	12.1%	9.5%
Healthcare	11.8%	10.1%
Industrials	10.5%	10.1%
Financial Services	10.4%	10.6%
Energy	6.4%	3.9%
Communication Services	6.2%	10.7%
Utilities	5.9%	6.7%
Real Estate	3.4%	6.4%
Basic Materials	2.6%	-

Return for Risk

SHUS vs. VFMV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SHUS

SHUS Risk / Return Rank: 51
SHUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
SHUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
SHUS Omega Ratio Rank: 48
SHUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
SHUS Martin Ratio Rank: 52

VFMV

VFMV Risk / Return Rank: 43
VFMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
VFMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
VFMV Omega Ratio Rank: 39
VFMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
VFMV Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SHUS vs. VFMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Syntax Stratified U.S. Total Market Hedged ETF (SHUS) and Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SHUS	VFMV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.72	1.49	+0.23
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.54	2.17	+0.37
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.26	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.47	2.18	+0.29
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.81	8.57	+0.24
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SHUS vs. VFMV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHUS Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is comparable to the VFMV Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHUS and VFMV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SHUS	VFMV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.72	1.49	+0.23
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.84	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.80	0.69	+0.10

Drawdowns

SHUS vs. VFMV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHUS drawdown since its inception was -14.09%, smaller than the maximum VFMV drawdown of -33.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHUS and VFMV.

Drawdown Indicators

	SHUS	VFMV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.09%	-33.64%	+19.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.95%	-6.00%	-0.95%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-10.35%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-15.41%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.31%	-1.02%	+0.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.65%	-3.64%	+0.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.94%	1.53%	+0.41%

Volatility

SHUS vs. VFMV - Volatility Comparison

Syntax Stratified U.S. Total Market Hedged ETF (SHUS) has a higher volatility of 2.31% compared to Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV) at 2.09%. This indicates that SHUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VFMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SHUS	VFMV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.31%	2.09%	+0.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.06%	6.30%	+0.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.01%	8.80%	+1.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.61%	11.75%	+0.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.61%	14.25%	-1.64%

SHUS vs. VFMV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SHUS has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than VFMV's 0.13% expense ratio.

Dividends

SHUS vs. VFMV - Dividend Comparison

SHUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, less than VFMV's 1.93% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
SHUS Syntax Stratified U.S. Total Market Hedged ETF	1.27%	1.37%	0.26%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VFMV Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF	1.93%	2.12%	1.46%	2.20%	2.08%	1.31%	2.14%	2.43%	2.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SHUS and VFMV in my portfolio?

SHUS and VFMV have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SHUS or VFMV?

SHUS has higher volatility (2.31%) compared to VFMV (2.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHUS dropped -14.09% vs VFMV's -33.64%.

Which ETF is better, SHUS or VFMV?

On 1-year performance, SHUS leads with 17.10% vs 13.05% for VFMV. On fees, VFMV is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, VFMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SHUS or VFMV?

Over the 1-year period, SHUS has performed better with a 17.10% return vs 13.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SHUS or VFMV?

VFMV is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SHUS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SHUS or VFMV?

VFMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.93%, compared with 1.27% for SHUS.

What is the main difference between SHUS and VFMV?

SHUS is categorized as Hedge Fund, while VFMV is Mid Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Syntax Advisors and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for SHUS and 0.13% for VFMV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SHUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.