PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SHUS vs. VFMV
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SHUS vs. VFMV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Syntax Stratified U.S. Total Market Hedged ETF (SHUS) and Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SHUS vs. VFMV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
SHUS
Syntax Stratified U.S. Total Market Hedged ETF
0.99%10.89%-2.65%
VFMV
Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF
2.55%10.52%-0.44%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHUS achieves a 0.99% return, which is significantly lower than VFMV's 2.55% return.


SHUS

1D
1.31%
1M
-5.74%
YTD
0.99%
6M
2.29%
1Y
11.39%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VFMV

1D
1.45%
1M
-4.47%
YTD
2.55%
6M
2.66%
1Y
7.33%
3Y*
12.70%
5Y*
9.24%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SHUS vs. VFMV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SHUS has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than VFMV's 0.13% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

SHUS vs. VFMV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SHUS
SHUS Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
SHUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHUS Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
SHUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHUS Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

VFMV
VFMV Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
VFMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFMV Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
VFMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFMV Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SHUS vs. VFMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Syntax Stratified U.S. Total Market Hedged ETF (SHUS) and Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SHUSVFMVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.86

0.60

+0.26

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.27

0.90

+0.37

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.13

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.34

0.87

+0.48

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.27

4.02

+1.24

SHUS vs. VFMV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHUS Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is higher than the VFMV Sharpe Ratio of 0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHUS and VFMV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SHUSVFMVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

0.60

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.65

-0.19

Correlation

The correlation between SHUS and VFMV is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

SHUS vs. VFMV - Dividend Comparison

SHUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, less than VFMV's 2.04% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
SHUS
Syntax Stratified U.S. Total Market Hedged ETF
1.36%1.37%0.26%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VFMV
Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF
2.04%2.12%1.46%2.20%2.08%1.31%2.14%2.43%2.29%

Drawdowns

SHUS vs. VFMV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHUS drawdown since its inception was -14.09%, smaller than the maximum VFMV drawdown of -33.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHUS and VFMV.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SHUSVFMVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.09%

-33.64%

+19.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.12%

-9.63%

+0.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.74%

-4.59%

-1.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.76%

-3.69%

+0.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.32%

2.07%

+0.25%

Volatility

SHUS vs. VFMV - Volatility Comparison

Syntax Stratified U.S. Total Market Hedged ETF (SHUS) and Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV) have volatilities of 3.54% and 3.44%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SHUSVFMVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.54%

3.44%

+0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.45%

6.62%

+0.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.38%

12.31%

+1.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.94%

11.77%

+1.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.94%

14.35%

-1.41%