SHUS vs. SSPY

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

SHUS (Syntax Stratified U.S. Total Market Hedged ETF) and SSPY (Stratified LargeCap Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SHUS is a Hedge Fund fund actively managed by Syntax Advisors, while SSPY is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Syntax Stratified LargeCap Index. SHUS is actively managed, while SSPY is passively managed. Over the past year, SHUS returned 16.83% vs 20.12% for SSPY. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SHUS charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for SSPY.

Performance

SHUS vs. SSPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Syntax Stratified U.S. Total Market Hedged ETF (SHUS) and Stratified LargeCap Index ETF (SSPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHUS achieves a 8.73% return, which is significantly lower than SSPY's 10.20% return.

SHUS

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: 0.74%
• YTD: 8.73%
• 6M: 8.13%
• 1Y: 16.83%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SSPY

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.69%
• YTD: 10.20%
• 6M: 9.59%
• 1Y: 20.12%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SHUS vs. SSPY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SHUS Syntax Stratified U.S. Total Market Hedged ETF	8.73%	10.89%	-2.65%
SSPY Stratified LargeCap Index ETF	10.20%	12.88%	-0.90%

Correlation

The correlation between SHUS and SSPY is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.98
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2024	0.94

The correlation between SHUS and SSPY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

SHUS vs. SSPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SHUS	SSPY
Technology	20.2%	20.2%
Consumer Cyclical	12.8%	12.8%
Healthcare	11.9%	11.9%
Consumer Defensive	11.7%	11.7%
Industrials	10.2%	10.2%
Financial Services	10.0%	10.0%
Communication Services	6.0%	6.0%
Energy	5.8%	5.8%
Utilities	5.6%	5.6%
Real Estate	3.4%	3.4%
Basic Materials	2.5%	2.5%

Return for Risk

SHUS vs. SSPY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SHUS

SHUS Risk / Return Rank: 53
SHUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
SHUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
SHUS Omega Ratio Rank: 50
SHUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
SHUS Martin Ratio Rank: 54

SSPY

SSPY Risk / Return Rank: 61
SSPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
SSPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
SSPY Omega Ratio Rank: 58
SSPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
SSPY Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SHUS vs. SSPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Syntax Stratified U.S. Total Market Hedged ETF (SHUS) and Stratified LargeCap Index ETF (SSPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SHUS	SSPY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.66	1.87	-0.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.44	2.74	-0.31
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.33	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.43	2.76	-0.33
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.63	10.55	-1.92

SHUS vs. SSPY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHUS Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is comparable to the SSPY Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHUS and SSPY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SHUS vs. SSPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHUS drawdown since its inception was -14.09%, smaller than the maximum SSPY drawdown of -16.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHUS and SSPY.

Drawdown Indicators

	SHUS	SSPY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.09%	-16.16%	+2.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.95%	-7.32%	+0.37%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.33%	-1.43%	+0.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.59%	-2.27%	-0.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.96%	1.91%	+0.05%

Volatility

SHUS vs. SSPY - Volatility Comparison

Syntax Stratified U.S. Total Market Hedged ETF (SHUS) and Stratified LargeCap Index ETF (SSPY) have volatilities of 3.18% and 3.16%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SHUS	SSPY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.18%	3.16%	+0.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.37%	7.91%	-0.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.17%	10.80%	-0.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.60%	14.48%	-1.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.60%	14.48%	-1.88%

SHUS vs. SSPY - Expense Ratio Comparison

SHUS has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than SSPY's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

SHUS vs. SSPY - Dividend Comparison

SHUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, which matches SSPY's 1.26% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
SHUS Syntax Stratified U.S. Total Market Hedged ETF	1.26%	1.37%	0.26%
SSPY Stratified LargeCap Index ETF	1.26%	1.38%	0.35%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SHUS and SSPY in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.98, SHUS and SSPY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, SHUS or SSPY?

SHUS has higher volatility (3.18%) compared to SSPY (3.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHUS dropped -14.09% vs SSPY's -16.16%.

Which ETF is better, SHUS or SSPY?

On 1-year performance, SSPY leads with 20.12% vs 16.83% for SHUS. On fees, SSPY is cheaper at 0.45% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SHUS or SSPY?

Over the 1-year period, SSPY has performed better with a 20.12% return vs 16.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SHUS or SSPY?

SSPY is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SHUS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SHUS or SSPY?

SHUS and SSPY have nearly identical dividend yields, around 1.26%.

What is the main difference between SHUS and SSPY?

SHUS is categorized as Hedge Fund, while SSPY is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Syntax Advisors and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for SHUS and 0.45% for SSPY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SSPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.