SHUS vs. SMMU
Compare and contrast key facts about Syntax Stratified U.S. Total Market Hedged ETF (SHUS) and PIMCO Short Term Municipal Bond Active ETF (SMMU).
SHUS and SMMU are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SHUS is an actively managed fund by Syntax Advisors. It was launched on Jun 15, 2021. SMMU is an actively managed fund by PIMCO. It was launched on Feb 1, 2010.
Performance
SHUS vs. SMMU - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SHUS vs. SMMU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SHUS Syntax Stratified U.S. Total Market Hedged ETF | 0.99% | 10.89% | -2.65% |
SMMU PIMCO Short Term Municipal Bond Active ETF | 0.49% | 4.06% | -0.30% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SHUS achieves a 0.99% return, which is significantly higher than SMMU's 0.49% return.
SHUS
- 1D
- 1.31%
- 1M
- -5.74%
- YTD
- 0.99%
- 6M
- 2.29%
- 1Y
- 11.39%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMMU
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -0.63%
- YTD
- 0.49%
- 6M
- 1.19%
- 1Y
- 3.72%
- 3Y*
- 3.41%
- 5Y*
- 1.85%
- 10Y*
- 1.80%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SHUS vs. SMMU - Expense Ratio Comparison
SHUS has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than SMMU's 0.35% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SHUS vs. SMMU — Risk / Return Rank
SHUS
SMMU
SHUS vs. SMMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Syntax Stratified U.S. Total Market Hedged ETF (SHUS) and PIMCO Short Term Municipal Bond Active ETF (SMMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SHUS | SMMU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.86 | 2.10 | -1.24 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.27 | 2.53 | -1.25 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.59 | -0.42 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.34 | 2.03 | -0.69 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.27 | 10.49 | -5.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SHUS | SMMU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 | 2.10 | -1.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.11 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.59 | -0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between SHUS and SMMU is 0.17, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
SHUS vs. SMMU - Dividend Comparison
SHUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, less than SMMU's 2.79% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHUS Syntax Stratified U.S. Total Market Hedged ETF | 1.36% | 1.37% | 0.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMMU PIMCO Short Term Municipal Bond Active ETF | 2.79% | 2.80% | 3.03% | 2.79% | 1.37% | 0.60% | 1.19% | 1.82% | 1.57% | 1.41% | 1.03% | 0.89% |
Drawdowns
SHUS vs. SMMU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SHUS drawdown since its inception was -14.09%, which is greater than SMMU's maximum drawdown of -5.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHUS and SMMU.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SHUS | SMMU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.09% | -5.09% | -9.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.12% | -1.95% | -7.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -4.76% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -5.09% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.74% | -0.63% | -5.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.76% | -0.55% | -2.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.32% | 0.38% | +1.94% |
Volatility
SHUS vs. SMMU - Volatility Comparison
Syntax Stratified U.S. Total Market Hedged ETF (SHUS) has a higher volatility of 3.54% compared to PIMCO Short Term Municipal Bond Active ETF (SMMU) at 0.53%. This indicates that SHUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMMU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SHUS | SMMU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.54% | 0.53% | +3.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.45% | 0.74% | +6.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.38% | 1.79% | +11.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.94% | 1.67% | +11.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.94% | 2.75% | +10.19% |