PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SHUS vs. FAAR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SHUS vs. FAAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Syntax Stratified U.S. Total Market Hedged ETF (SHUS) and First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SHUS vs. FAAR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHUS achieves a 0.99% return, which is significantly lower than FAAR's 24.94% return.


SHUS

1D
1.31%
1M
-5.74%
YTD
0.99%
6M
2.29%
1Y
11.39%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FAAR

1D
-0.05%
1M
12.00%
YTD
24.94%
6M
21.95%
1Y
30.08%
3Y*
10.56%
5Y*
9.41%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SHUS vs. FAAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

SHUS has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than FAAR's 0.95% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

SHUS vs. FAAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SHUS
SHUS Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
SHUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHUS Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
SHUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHUS Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

FAAR
FAAR Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
FAAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAAR Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
FAAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAAR Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SHUS vs. FAAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Syntax Stratified U.S. Total Market Hedged ETF (SHUS) and First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SHUSFAARDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.86

1.97

-1.12

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.27

2.65

-1.38

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.35

-0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.34

2.71

-1.37

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.27

7.95

-2.68

SHUS vs. FAAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHUS Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is lower than the FAAR Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHUS and FAAR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SHUSFAARDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

1.97

-1.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.45

+0.01

Correlation

The correlation between SHUS and FAAR is 0.05, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

SHUS vs. FAAR - Dividend Comparison

SHUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, less than FAAR's 9.21% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
SHUS
Syntax Stratified U.S. Total Market Hedged ETF
1.36%1.37%0.26%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FAAR
First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF
9.21%11.63%3.45%3.20%5.82%6.49%3.05%1.02%0.58%2.83%

Drawdowns

SHUS vs. FAAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHUS drawdown since its inception was -14.09%, smaller than the maximum FAAR drawdown of -18.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHUS and FAAR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SHUSFAARDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.09%

-18.03%

+3.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.12%

-11.54%

+2.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.74%

-0.51%

-5.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.76%

-7.97%

+5.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.32%

3.93%

-1.61%

Volatility

SHUS vs. FAAR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Syntax Stratified U.S. Total Market Hedged ETF (SHUS) is 3.54%, while First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR) has a volatility of 5.66%. This indicates that SHUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FAAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SHUSFAARDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.54%

5.66%

-2.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.45%

10.64%

-3.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.38%

15.33%

-1.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.94%

13.00%

-0.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.94%

11.54%

+1.40%