SHUS vs. CEFS

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

SHUS (Stratified LargeCap Hedged ETF) and CEFS (Saba Closed-End Funds ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SHUS is a Equity Hedged fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts, while CEFS is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SHUS returned 18.95% vs 21.51% for CEFS. Their 0.50 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. SHUS charges 0.79%/yr vs 2.61%/yr for CEFS.

Performance

SHUS vs. CEFS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Stratified LargeCap Hedged ETF (SHUS) and Saba Closed-End Funds ETF (CEFS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHUS achieves a 11.99% return, which is significantly lower than CEFS's 12.79% return.

SHUS

• 1D: 0.74%
• 1M: 0.95%
• 6M: 8.10%
• YTD: 11.99%
• 1Y: 18.95%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 10.87%

CEFS

• 1D: 0.60%
• 1M: -2.52%
• 6M: 11.34%
• YTD: 12.79%
• 1Y: 21.51%
• 3Y*: 20.18%
• 5Y*: 13.54%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 11.83%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CEFS Saba Closed-End Funds ETF	$2.11M	$2.21M	$2.24M
SHUS Stratified LargeCap Hedged ETF	$376.99	$481.64	$2.74K

SHUS vs. CEFS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SHUS Stratified LargeCap Hedged ETF	11.99%	10.89%	-2.65%
CEFS Saba Closed-End Funds ETF	12.79%	16.67%	-0.23%

Correlation

The correlation between SHUS and CEFS is 0.43, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.43
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2024	0.50

The correlation between SHUS and CEFS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.43 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SHUS vs. CEFS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SHUS

SHUS Risk / Return Rank: 76
SHUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
SHUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
SHUS Omega Ratio Rank: 75
SHUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
SHUS Martin Ratio Rank: 74

CEFS

CEFS Risk / Return Rank: 86
CEFS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
CEFS Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
CEFS Omega Ratio Rank: 83
CEFS Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
CEFS Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SHUS vs. CEFS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Stratified LargeCap Hedged ETF (SHUS) and Saba Closed-End Funds ETF (CEFS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SHUS	CEFS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.89	1.99	-0.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.77	2.88	-0.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.36	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.74	3.81	-1.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.87	13.08	-3.21

SHUS vs. CEFS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHUS Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is comparable to the CEFS Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHUS and CEFS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SHUS vs. CEFS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHUS drawdown since its inception was -14.09%, smaller than the maximum CEFS drawdown of -38.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHUS and CEFS.

Drawdown Indicators

	SHUS	CEFS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.09%	-38.99%	+24.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.95%	-5.67%	-1.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.37%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-16.85%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.33%	-2.52%	+2.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.47%	-3.63%	+1.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.92%	1.65%	+0.27%

Volatility

SHUS vs. CEFS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Stratified LargeCap Hedged ETF (SHUS) is 2.87%, while Saba Closed-End Funds ETF (CEFS) has a volatility of 3.26%. This indicates that SHUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CEFS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SHUS	CEFS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.87%	3.26%	-0.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.39%	9.40%	-2.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.09%	10.90%	-0.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.41%	13.23%	-0.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.41%	15.30%	-2.89%

SHUS vs. CEFS - Expense Ratio Comparison

SHUS has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than CEFS's 2.61% expense ratio.

Dividends

SHUS vs. CEFS - Dividend Comparison

SHUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, less than CEFS's 7.24% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CEFS Saba Closed-End Funds ETF	7.24%	7.84%	8.79%	9.20%	11.32%	10.73%	8.61%	8.10%	10.43%	5.02%
SHUS Stratified LargeCap Hedged ETF	1.23%	1.37%	0.26%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SHUS and CEFS in my portfolio?

SHUS and CEFS have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SHUS or CEFS?

CEFS has higher volatility (3.26%) compared to SHUS (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHUS dropped -14.09% vs CEFS's -38.99%.

Which ETF is better, SHUS or CEFS?

On 1-year performance, CEFS leads with 21.51% vs 18.95% for SHUS. On fees, SHUS is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, SHUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SHUS or CEFS?

Over the 1-year period, CEFS has performed better with a 21.51% return vs 18.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SHUS or CEFS?

SHUS is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 2.61% for CEFS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SHUS or CEFS?

CEFS has the higher dividend yield at 7.24%, compared with 1.23% for SHUS.

What is the main difference between SHUS and CEFS?

SHUS is categorized as Equity Hedged, while CEFS is Actively Managed. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for SHUS and 2.61% for CEFS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CEFS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.