PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SHPP vs. ROKT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SHPP vs. ROKT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF (SHPP) and SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF (ROKT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SHPP vs. ROKT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
SHPP
Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF
2.70%12.88%0.76%20.86%-4.12%
ROKT
SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF
16.96%50.56%27.89%14.41%4.49%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHPP achieves a 2.70% return, which is significantly lower than ROKT's 16.96% return.


SHPP

1D
2.99%
1M
-8.40%
YTD
2.70%
6M
7.77%
1Y
18.36%
3Y*
8.22%
5Y*
10Y*

ROKT

1D
4.44%
1M
-4.02%
YTD
16.96%
6M
30.61%
1Y
87.29%
3Y*
35.37%
5Y*
20.32%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SHPP vs. ROKT - Expense Ratio Comparison

SHPP has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than ROKT's 0.45% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

SHPP vs. ROKT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SHPP
SHPP Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
SHPP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHPP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHPP Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
SHPP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHPP Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

ROKT
ROKT Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
ROKT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROKT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROKT Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
ROKT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROKT Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SHPP vs. ROKT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF (SHPP) and SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF (ROKT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SHPPROKTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.00

3.00

-2.00

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.50

3.66

-2.16

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.50

-0.30

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.43

6.48

-5.05

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.64

24.82

-19.17

SHPP vs. ROKT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHPP Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is lower than the ROKT Sharpe Ratio of 3.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHPP and ROKT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SHPPROKTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

3.00

-2.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.75

-0.27

Correlation

The correlation between SHPP and ROKT is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

SHPP vs. ROKT - Dividend Comparison

SHPP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%, more than ROKT's 0.34% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
SHPP
Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF
1.89%1.80%2.41%2.89%1.15%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ROKT
SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF
0.34%0.41%0.57%0.62%0.54%1.79%0.48%0.74%0.16%

Drawdowns

SHPP vs. ROKT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHPP drawdown since its inception was -21.57%, smaller than the maximum ROKT drawdown of -43.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHPP and ROKT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SHPPROKTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.57%

-43.16%

+21.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.89%

-13.36%

+0.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.40%

-7.46%

-0.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.38%

-6.86%

+2.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.27%

3.49%

-0.22%

Volatility

SHPP vs. ROKT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF (SHPP) is 6.32%, while SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF (ROKT) has a volatility of 10.58%. This indicates that SHPP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ROKT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SHPPROKTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.32%

10.58%

-4.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.05%

22.67%

-11.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.42%

29.22%

-10.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.39%

21.87%

-4.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.39%

24.78%

-7.39%