PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SHIP vs. IMMR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SHIP vs. IMMR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (SHIP) and Immersion Corporation (IMMR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHIP achieves a 69.69% return, which is significantly higher than IMMR's 0.39% return. Over the past 10 years, SHIP has underperformed IMMR with an annualized return of -42.13%, while IMMR has yielded a comparatively higher 1.41% annualized return.


SHIP

1D
-0.26%
1M
-7.22%
YTD
69.69%
6M
52.26%
1Y
150.72%
3Y*
60.51%
5Y*
15.33%
10Y*
-42.13%

IMMR

1D
4.71%
1M
-0.15%
YTD
0.39%
6M
-3.03%
1Y
-10.21%
3Y*
-2.01%
5Y*
-3.62%
10Y*
1.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SHIP vs. IMMR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SHIP
Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.
69.69%38.48%-3.81%61.04%-36.53%70.83%-93.89%-92.71%-51.66%-9.57%
IMMR
Immersion Corporation
0.39%-18.30%26.47%3.43%23.12%-49.42%51.95%-17.08%26.91%-33.58%

Correlation

The correlation between SHIP and IMMR is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2007

0.09

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM)

SHIP:

$158.10M

IMMR:

$1.47B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SHIP:

$62.63M

IMMR:

$409.86M

EBITDA (TTM)

SHIP:

$78.01M

IMMR:

$188.76M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SHIP vs. IMMR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SHIP
SHIP Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
SHIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHIP Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
SHIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHIP Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

IMMR
IMMR Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
IMMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMMR Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
IMMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMMR Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SHIP vs. IMMR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (SHIP) and Immersion Corporation (IMMR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SHIPIMMRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

0.99

+0.51

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.17

-0.33

+8.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.14

-0.61

+20.75

SHIP vs. IMMR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHIP Sharpe Ratio is 3.57, which is higher than the IMMR Sharpe Ratio of -0.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHIP and IMMR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SHIPIMMRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.57

-0.26

+3.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

-0.08

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.43

0.03

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.10

-0.04

-0.05

Drawdowns

SHIP vs. IMMR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHIP drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, roughly equal to the maximum IMMR drawdown of -98.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHIP and IMMR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SHIPIMMRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-100.00%

-98.66%

-1.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.56%

-30.86%

+12.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-57.61%

-56.90%

-0.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-69.11%

-56.90%

-12.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.98%

-74.29%

-25.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.98%

-89.65%

-10.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-86.57%

-88.21%

+1.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.51%

16.77%

-9.26%

Volatility

SHIP vs. IMMR - Volatility Comparison

Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (SHIP) has a higher volatility of 15.48% compared to Immersion Corporation (IMMR) at 12.61%. This indicates that SHIP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IMMR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SHIPIMMRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.48%

12.61%

+2.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.66%

27.21%

+6.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.56%

39.79%

+2.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

52.08%

45.83%

+6.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

98.57%

51.32%

+47.25%

Dividends

SHIP vs. IMMR - Dividend Comparison

SHIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, less than IMMR's 3.60% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
IMMR
Immersion Corporation
3.60%5.59%2.06%3.12%0.00%
SHIP
Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.
2.79%3.58%10.58%1.28%25.23%

Financials

SHIP vs. IMMR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. and Immersion Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M600.00MAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
49.42M
281.38M
(SHIP) Total Revenue
(IMMR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


SHIP and IMMR have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SHIP has higher volatility (15.48%) compared to IMMR (12.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHIP dropped -100.00% vs IMMR's -98.66%.

SHIP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.57 vs -0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SHIP and IMMR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer