PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SHE vs. PFM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SHE vs. PFM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR SSGA Gender Diversity Index ETF (SHE) and Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PFM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHE achieves a 19.56% return, which is significantly higher than PFM's 8.18% return. Over the past 10 years, SHE has outperformed PFM with an annualized return of 12.83%, while PFM has yielded a comparatively lower 11.82% annualized return.


SHE

1D
-0.58%
1M
10.08%
YTD
19.56%
6M
21.08%
1Y
31.32%
3Y*
24.28%
5Y*
10.89%
10Y*
12.83%

PFM

1D
-0.23%
1M
3.40%
YTD
8.18%
6M
7.73%
1Y
19.65%
3Y*
16.31%
5Y*
10.63%
10Y*
11.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SHE vs. PFM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SHE
SPDR SSGA Gender Diversity Index ETF
19.56%15.50%23.35%22.37%-21.73%15.17%17.93%23.63%-3.48%19.56%
PFM
Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF
8.18%14.00%16.87%11.40%-6.22%23.08%9.53%26.88%-4.58%17.65%

Correlation

The correlation between SHE and PFM is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2016

0.85

The correlation between SHE and PFM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

SHE vs. PFM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SHE
PFM

Technology

38.0%
24.7%

Financial Services

11.9%
18.5%

Communication Services

9.5%
1.1%

Industrials

8.9%
11.1%

Consumer Cyclical

8.9%
4.0%

Healthcare

8.7%
14.9%

Consumer Defensive

4.6%
12.0%

Energy

3.4%
4.7%

Utilities

2.2%
4.2%

Real Estate

1.9%
2.0%

Basic Materials

1.9%
3.0%

Technology

SHE
38.0%
PFM
24.7%

Financial Services

SHE
11.9%
PFM
18.5%

Communication Services

SHE
9.5%
PFM
1.1%

Industrials

SHE
8.9%
PFM
11.1%

Consumer Cyclical

SHE
8.9%
PFM
4.0%

Healthcare

SHE
8.7%
PFM
14.9%

Consumer Defensive

SHE
4.6%
PFM
12.0%

Energy

SHE
3.4%
PFM
4.7%

Utilities

SHE
2.2%
PFM
4.2%

Real Estate

SHE
1.9%
PFM
2.0%

Basic Materials

SHE
1.9%
PFM
3.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SHE vs. PFM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SHE
SHE Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
SHE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHE Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
SHE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHE Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

PFM
PFM Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
PFM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFM Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
PFM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFM Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SHE vs. PFM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR SSGA Gender Diversity Index ETF (SHE) and Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PFM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SHEPFMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.38

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.68

2.78

+0.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.98

11.28

+3.70

SHE vs. PFM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHE Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is comparable to the PFM Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHE and PFM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SHEPFMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.43

2.09

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.79

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

0.78

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

0.53

+0.21

Drawdowns

SHE vs. PFM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHE drawdown since its inception was -35.80%, smaller than the maximum PFM drawdown of -53.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHE and PFM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SHEPFMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.80%

-53.21%

+17.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.54%

-7.09%

-1.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.07%

-14.50%

-2.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.69%

-17.81%

-13.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.80%

-32.22%

-3.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.58%

-0.23%

-0.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.30%

-6.94%

+0.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.10%

1.75%

+0.35%

Volatility

SHE vs. PFM - Volatility Comparison

SPDR SSGA Gender Diversity Index ETF (SHE) has a higher volatility of 5.06% compared to Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PFM) at 2.04%. This indicates that SHE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SHEPFMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.06%

2.04%

+3.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.29%

7.13%

+3.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.94%

9.47%

+3.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.22%

13.54%

+3.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.04%

15.21%

+2.83%

SHE vs. PFM - Expense Ratio Comparison

SHE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than PFM's 0.53% expense ratio.


Dividends

SHE vs. PFM - Dividend Comparison

SHE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, less than PFM's 1.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PFM
Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF
1.33%1.41%1.58%1.86%1.95%1.69%1.92%1.94%2.27%1.70%2.56%2.36%
SHE
SPDR SSGA Gender Diversity Index ETF
1.06%1.18%1.14%1.37%1.54%0.99%1.24%1.91%7.39%5.37%6.41%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SHE and PFM have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SHE has higher volatility (5.06%) compared to PFM (2.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHE dropped -35.80% vs PFM's -53.21%.

On 10-year performance, SHE leads with 12.83% vs 11.82% for PFM. On fees, SHE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, PFM has been the lower-risk option at 2.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SHE has performed better with a 12.83% return vs 11.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SHE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for PFM.

PFM has the higher dividend yield at 1.33%, compared with 1.06% for SHE.

SHE tracks SSGA Gender Diversity (TR), while PFM tracks NASDAQ US Broad Dividend Achievers Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SHE and 0.53% for PFM.

SHE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SHE and PFM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer