SGVT vs. FNDF
SGVT (Schwab Government Money Market ETF) and FNDF (Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SGVT is a Money Market fund actively managed by Charles Schwab, while FNDF is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Russell Fundamental Developed ex-U.S. Large Company Index. SGVT is actively managed, while FNDF is passively managed. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SGVT charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FNDF.
Performance
SGVT vs. FNDF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SGVT achieves a 1.41% return, which is significantly lower than FNDF's 21.21% return.
SGVT
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 1.41%
- 6M
- 1.71%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FNDF
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- 6.97%
- YTD
- 21.21%
- 6M
- 24.72%
- 1Y
- 44.71%
- 3Y*
- 24.10%
- 5Y*
- 13.35%
- 10Y*
- 11.93%
SGVT vs. FNDF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SGVT Schwab Government Money Market ETF | 1.41% | 2.22% |
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF | 21.21% | 17.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between SGVT and FNDF is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2025 | 0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SGVT vs. FNDF — Risk / Return Rank
SGVT
FNDF
SGVT vs. FNDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Government Money Market ETF (SGVT) and Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SGVT | FNDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.99 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.68 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 18.57 | 0.54 | +18.03 |
Drawdowns
SGVT vs. FNDF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SGVT drawdown since its inception was -0.03%, smaller than the maximum FNDF drawdown of -40.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGVT and FNDF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SGVT | FNDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.03% | -40.14% | +40.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.60% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.89% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.56% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.14% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.67% | +0.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.00% | -7.64% | +7.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.77% | — |
Volatility
SGVT vs. FNDF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SGVT | FNDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.26% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.53% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20% | 15.06% | -14.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.20% | 16.18% | -15.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.20% | 17.67% | -17.47% |
SGVT vs. FNDF - Expense Ratio Comparison
SGVT has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than FNDF's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
SGVT vs. FNDF - Dividend Comparison
SGVT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.12%, more than FNDF's 2.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF | 2.84% | 3.44% | 4.01% | 3.41% | 3.10% | 3.54% | 2.17% | 3.20% | 3.47% | 2.32% | 2.42% | 2.08% |
SGVT Schwab Government Money Market ETF | 3.12% | 1.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SGVT and FNDF have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FNDF is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FNDF is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for SGVT.
SGVT has the higher dividend yield at 3.12%, compared with 2.84% for FNDF.
SGVT is categorized as Money Market, while FNDF is Foreign Large Cap Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for SGVT and 0.25% for FNDF.
Find the right allocation for SGVT and FNDF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer