PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SGVT vs. SBIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SGVT vs. SBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Government Money Market ETF (SGVT) and Simplify Government Money Market ETF (SBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SGVT achieves a 1.58% return, which is significantly lower than SBIL's 1.66% return.


SGVT

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.23%
YTD
1.58%
6M
1.67%
1Y
3.73%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SBIL

1D
0.00%
1M
0.24%
YTD
1.66%
6M
1.74%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SGVT vs. SBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SGVT and SBIL is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025

0.23

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SGVT vs. SBIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SGVT
SGVT Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
SGVT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGVT Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGVT Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
SGVT Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGVT Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

SBIL

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SGVT vs. SBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Government Money Market ETF (SGVT) and Simplify Government Money Market ETF (SBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SGVTSBILDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

29.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

138.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1,254.38

SGVT vs. SBIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SGVT vs. SBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SGVT drawdown since its inception was -0.03%, roughly equal to the maximum SBIL drawdown of -0.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGVT and SBIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SGVTSBILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.03%

-0.03%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.02%

0.00%

-0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.00%

-0.00%

0.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.00%

Volatility

SGVT vs. SBIL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SGVTSBILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22%

0.27%

-0.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.22%

0.27%

-0.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.22%

0.27%

-0.05%

SGVT vs. SBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

SGVT has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than SBIL's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

SGVT vs. SBIL - Dividend Comparison

SGVT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.11%, less than SBIL's 3.25% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


SGVT and SBIL have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SBIL is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SBIL is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for SGVT.

SBIL has the higher dividend yield at 3.25%, compared with 3.11% for SGVT.

They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for SGVT and 0.15% for SBIL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SGVT and SBIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer