PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SGRT vs. GQGU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SGRT vs. GQGU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF (SGRT) and GQG US Equity ETF (GQGU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SGRT achieves a 48.90% return, which is significantly higher than GQGU's 6.44% return.


SGRT

1D
-1.69%
1M
9.59%
YTD
48.90%
6M
51.74%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GQGU

1D
-0.15%
1M
-1.69%
YTD
6.44%
6M
7.69%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SGRT vs. GQGU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
SGRT
SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF
48.90%25.25%
GQGU
GQG US Equity ETF
6.44%-3.27%

Correlation

The correlation between SGRT and GQGU is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2025

-0.26

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SGRT vs. GQGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF (SGRT) and GQG US Equity ETF (GQGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SGRT vs. GQGU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SGRTGQGUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.63

0.58

+3.05

Drawdowns

SGRT vs. GQGU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SGRT drawdown since its inception was -17.87%, which is greater than GQGU's maximum drawdown of -6.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGRT and GQGU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SGRTGQGUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.87%

-6.65%

-11.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.69%

-4.80%

+3.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.10%

-2.55%

-0.55%

Volatility

SGRT vs. GQGU - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SGRTGQGUDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.40%

10.12%

+23.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.40%

10.12%

+23.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.40%

10.12%

+23.28%

SGRT vs. GQGU - Expense Ratio Comparison

SGRT has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than GQGU's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

SGRT vs. GQGU - Dividend Comparison

SGRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than GQGU's 0.96% yield.


PositionTTM2025
GQGU
GQG US Equity ETF
0.96%1.02%
SGRT
SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF
0.11%0.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


SGRT and GQGU have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GQGU is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GQGU is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for SGRT.

GQGU has the higher dividend yield at 0.96%, compared with 0.11% for SGRT.

Their fees differ too: 0.59% for SGRT and 0.49% for GQGU.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SGRT and GQGU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer