SGRT vs. FNGS
SGRT (SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF) and FNGS (MicroSectors FANG+ ETN) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. SGRT is actively managed, while FNGS is passively managed. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SGRT charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for FNGS.
Performance
SGRT vs. FNGS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SGRT achieves a 48.90% return, which is significantly higher than FNGS's 13.45% return.
SGRT
- 1D
- -1.69%
- 1M
- 9.59%
- YTD
- 48.90%
- 6M
- 51.74%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FNGS
- 1D
- -2.42%
- 1M
- 7.85%
- YTD
- 13.45%
- 6M
- 8.38%
- 1Y
- 26.37%
- 3Y*
- 33.92%
- 5Y*
- 21.41%
- 10Y*
- —
SGRT vs. FNGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF | 48.90% | 25.25% |
FNGS MicroSectors FANG+ ETN | 13.45% | 4.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between SGRT and FNGS is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2025 | 0.62 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SGRT vs. FNGS — Risk / Return Rank
SGRT
FNGS
SGRT vs. FNGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF (SGRT) and MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SGRT | FNGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.28 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.72 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.63 | 1.04 | +2.59 |
Drawdowns
SGRT vs. FNGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SGRT drawdown since its inception was -17.87%, smaller than the maximum FNGS drawdown of -48.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGRT and FNGS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SGRT | FNGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.87% | -48.98% | +31.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -22.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.77% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -48.98% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.69% | -3.99% | +2.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.10% | -10.86% | +7.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 7.93% | — |
Volatility
SGRT vs. FNGS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SGRT | FNGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.36% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.88% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.40% | 20.64% | +12.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.40% | 29.97% | +3.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.40% | 31.13% | +2.27% |
SGRT vs. FNGS - Expense Ratio Comparison
SGRT has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than FNGS's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
SGRT vs. FNGS - Dividend Comparison
SGRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, while FNGS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
FNGS MicroSectors FANG+ ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF | 0.11% | 0.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SGRT and FNGS have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FNGS is cheaper at 0.58% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FNGS is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for SGRT.
SGRT has the higher dividend yield at 0.11%, compared with 0.00% for FNGS.
Their fees differ too: 0.59% for SGRT and 0.58% for FNGS.
Find the right allocation for SGRT and FNGS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer