SGRT vs. FITZ

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

SGRT (SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF) and FITZ (Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.10, they often move in opposite directions. SGRT charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for FITZ.

Performance

SGRT vs. FITZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF (SGRT) and Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF (FITZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

SGRT

• 1D: -1.69%
• 1M: 9.59%
• YTD: 48.90%
• 6M: 51.74%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FITZ

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SGRT vs. FITZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF	1.86%
FITZ Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF	-1.66%

Correlation

The correlation between SGRT and FITZ is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026	-0.10

Return for Risk

SGRT vs. FITZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF (SGRT) and Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF (FITZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SGRT	FITZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	3.63	-7.29	+10.92

Drawdowns

SGRT vs. FITZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SGRT drawdown since its inception was -17.87%, which is greater than FITZ's maximum drawdown of -1.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGRT and FITZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	SGRT	FITZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.87%	-1.97%	-15.90%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.69%	-1.97%	+0.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.10%	-1.08%	-2.02%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SGRT	FITZ	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	33.40%	8.74%	+24.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.40%	8.74%	+24.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.40%	8.74%	+24.66%

SGRT vs. FITZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SGRT has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than FITZ's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

SGRT vs. FITZ - Dividend Comparison

SGRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, while FITZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
FITZ Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF	0.00%	0.00%
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF	0.11%	0.16%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SGRT and FITZ in my portfolio?

SGRT and FITZ have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SGRT or FITZ?

On fees, SGRT is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SGRT or FITZ?

SGRT is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FITZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SGRT or FITZ?

SGRT has the higher dividend yield at 0.11%, compared with 0.00% for FITZ.

What is the main difference between SGRT and FITZ?

Their fees differ too: 0.59% for SGRT and 0.75% for FITZ.