SGML vs. RMBS
SGML (Sigma Lithium Resources Corp) and RMBS (Rambus Inc.) are both stocks. SGML operates in Other Industrial Metals & Mining (Basic Materials), while RMBS operates in Semiconductors (Technology). Over the past 3 years, SGML returned -28.84%/yr vs 38.88%/yr for RMBS. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SGML vs. RMBS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SGML achieves a 11.68% return, which is significantly lower than RMBS's 84.30% return.
SGML
- 1D
- -2.84%
- 1M
- -34.62%
- YTD
- 11.68%
- 6M
- 47.60%
- 1Y
- 196.98%
- 3Y*
- -28.84%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RMBS
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- 43.52%
- YTD
- 84.30%
- 6M
- 71.39%
- 1Y
- 196.33%
- 3Y*
- 38.88%
- 5Y*
- 53.94%
- 10Y*
- 29.97%
SGML vs. RMBS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGML Sigma Lithium Resources Corp | 11.68% | 17.56% | -64.41% | 11.73% | 171.09% | 28.52% |
RMBS Rambus Inc. | 84.30% | 73.84% | -22.55% | 90.54% | 21.88% | 23.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between SGML and RMBS is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2021 | 0.25 |
The correlation between SGML and RMBS shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (1 year) to 0.25 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
SGML:
$1.64B
RMBS:
$18.58B
SGML:
-$0.39
RMBS:
$2.11
SGML:
15.75
RMBS:
25.66
SGML:
22.59
RMBS:
13.34
SGML:
$104.10M
RMBS:
$721.16M
SGML:
$28.12M
RMBS:
$555.52M
SGML:
$5.88M
RMBS:
$298.07M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SGML vs. RMBS — Risk / Return Rank
SGML
RMBS
SGML vs. RMBS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sigma Lithium Resources Corp (SGML) and Rambus Inc. (RMBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SGML | RMBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.39 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.07 | 5.39 | -2.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.44 | 13.66 | -4.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SGML | RMBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 | 2.67 | -1.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.99 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.65 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.09 | 0.16 | -0.07 |
Drawdowns
SGML vs. RMBS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SGML drawdown since its inception was -89.91%, smaller than the maximum RMBS drawdown of -97.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGML and RMBS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SGML | RMBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.91% | -97.16% | +7.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -64.56% | -36.69% | -27.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -89.75% | -48.83% | -40.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -48.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -52.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -65.26% | -0.77% | -64.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.99% | -74.94% | +31.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.97% | 14.44% | +6.53% |
Volatility
SGML vs. RMBS - Volatility Comparison
Sigma Lithium Resources Corp (SGML) has a higher volatility of 24.58% compared to Rambus Inc. (RMBS) at 23.16%. This indicates that SGML's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RMBS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SGML | RMBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.58% | 23.16% | +1.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 221.74% | 59.52% | +162.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 283.15% | 74.04% | +209.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 143.51% | 54.88% | +88.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 143.51% | 45.98% | +97.53% |
Dividends
SGML vs. RMBS - Dividend Comparison
Neither SGML nor RMBS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
SGML vs. RMBS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sigma Lithium Resources Corp and Rambus Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SGML vs. RMBS - Profitability Comparison
SGML - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sigma Lithium Resources Corp reported a gross profit of 23.15M and revenue of 41.76M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.5%.
RMBS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rambus Inc. reported a gross profit of 143.66M and revenue of 180.19M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.7%.
SGML - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sigma Lithium Resources Corp reported an operating income of 19.48M and revenue of 41.76M, resulting in an operating margin of 46.7%.
RMBS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rambus Inc. reported an operating income of 61.76M and revenue of 180.19M, resulting in an operating margin of 34.3%.
SGML - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sigma Lithium Resources Corp reported a net income of 10.98M and revenue of 41.76M, resulting in a net margin of 26.3%.
RMBS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rambus Inc. reported a net income of 59.86M and revenue of 180.19M, resulting in a net margin of 33.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SGML and RMBS have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SGML has higher volatility (24.58%) compared to RMBS (23.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SGML dropped -89.91% vs RMBS's -97.16%.
RMBS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SGML and RMBS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer