SGML vs. BW
SGML (Sigma Lithium Resources Corp) and BW (Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc.) are both stocks. SGML operates in Other Industrial Metals & Mining (Basic Materials), while BW operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials). Over the past 3 years, SGML returned -27.49%/yr vs 46.96%/yr for BW. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SGML vs. BW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SGML achieves a 14.94% return, which is significantly lower than BW's 178.86% return.
SGML
- 1D
- -8.01%
- 1M
- -32.83%
- YTD
- 14.94%
- 6M
- 51.15%
- 1Y
- 202.59%
- 3Y*
- -27.49%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BW
- 1D
- -2.00%
- 1M
- 17.24%
- YTD
- 178.86%
- 6M
- 174.96%
- 1Y
- 2,004.76%
- 3Y*
- 46.96%
- 5Y*
- 14.74%
- 10Y*
- -22.27%
SGML vs. BW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGML Sigma Lithium Resources Corp | 14.94% | 17.56% | -64.41% | 11.73% | 171.09% | 28.52% |
BW Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. | 178.86% | 286.59% | 12.33% | -74.70% | -36.03% | 36.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between SGML and BW is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2021 | 0.26 |
Fundamentals
SGML:
$1.69B
BW:
$2.36B
SGML:
-$0.39
BW:
-$0.83
SGML:
16.21
BW:
3.02
SGML:
$104.10M
BW:
$668.48M
SGML:
$28.12M
BW:
$121.68M
SGML:
$5.88M
BW:
-$41.40M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SGML vs. BW — Risk / Return Rank
SGML
BW
SGML vs. BW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sigma Lithium Resources Corp (SGML) and Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. (BW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SGML | BW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -13.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.72 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.16 | 58.85 | -55.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.77 | 135.77 | -126.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SGML | BW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 | 14.19 | -13.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.13 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.21 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.10 | -0.19 | +0.29 |
Drawdowns
SGML vs. BW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SGML drawdown since its inception was -89.91%, smaller than the maximum BW drawdown of -99.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGML and BW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SGML | BW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.91% | -99.89% | +9.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -64.56% | -34.50% | -30.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -89.75% | -96.03% | +6.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -97.39% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -99.88% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -64.25% | -92.53% | +28.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.97% | -82.80% | +39.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.83% | 14.93% | +5.90% |
Volatility
SGML vs. BW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Sigma Lithium Resources Corp (SGML) is 24.63%, while Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. (BW) has a volatility of 34.66%. This indicates that SGML experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SGML | BW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.63% | 34.66% | -10.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 221.92% | 89.70% | +132.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 283.19% | 143.20% | +139.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 143.56% | 110.03% | +33.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 143.56% | 108.14% | +35.42% |
Dividends
SGML vs. BW - Dividend Comparison
Neither SGML nor BW has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
SGML vs. BW - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sigma Lithium Resources Corp and Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SGML vs. BW - Profitability Comparison
SGML - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sigma Lithium Resources Corp reported a gross profit of 23.15M and revenue of 41.76M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.5%.
BW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 214.41M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
SGML - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sigma Lithium Resources Corp reported an operating income of 19.48M and revenue of 41.76M, resulting in an operating margin of 46.7%.
BW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. reported an operating income of -79.62M and revenue of 214.41M, resulting in an operating margin of -37.1%.
SGML - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sigma Lithium Resources Corp reported a net income of 10.98M and revenue of 41.76M, resulting in a net margin of 26.3%.
BW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. reported a net income of -80.66M and revenue of 214.41M, resulting in a net margin of -37.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SGML and BW have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BW has higher volatility (34.66%) compared to SGML (24.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SGML dropped -89.91% vs BW's -99.89%.
BW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (14.19 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SGML and BW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer