SGML vs. CCO.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Sigma Lithium Resources Corp (SGML) and Cameco Corporation (CCO.TO).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SGML or CCO.TO.
Correlation
The correlation between SGML and CCO.TO is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
SGML vs. CCO.TO - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
SGML:
-0.36
CCO.TO:
0.37
SGML:
-0.14
CCO.TO:
0.78
SGML:
0.99
CCO.TO:
1.10
SGML:
-0.29
CCO.TO:
0.49
SGML:
-0.73
CCO.TO:
1.20
SGML:
31.17%
CCO.TO:
13.82%
SGML:
63.50%
CCO.TO:
45.14%
SGML:
-79.50%
CCO.TO:
-83.92%
SGML:
-73.54%
CCO.TO:
-23.36%
Fundamentals
SGML:
$1.26B
CCO.TO:
CA$28.81B
SGML:
-$0.44
CCO.TO:
CA$0.26
SGML:
$141.54M
CCO.TO:
CA$1.95B
SGML:
$20.47M
CCO.TO:
CA$524.31M
SGML:
$140.00K
CCO.TO:
CA$436.80M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SGML achieves a -0.00% return, which is significantly higher than CCO.TO's -10.45% return.
SGML
-0.00%
-6.58%
-1.41%
-12.34%
N/A
N/A
CCO.TO
-10.45%
-10.90%
17.72%
18.25%
41.48%
14.03%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SGML vs. CCO.TO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
SGML
CCO.TO
SGML vs. CCO.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sigma Lithium Resources Corp (SGML) and Cameco Corporation (CCO.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SGML vs. CCO.TO - Dividend Comparison
SGML has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CCO.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGML Sigma Lithium Resources Corp | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CCO.TO Cameco Corporation | 0.17% | 0.15% | 0.16% | 0.29% | 0.22% | 0.35% | 1.21% | 0.39% | 2.76% | 2.28% | 1.82% | 1.84% |
Drawdowns
SGML vs. CCO.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SGML drawdown since its inception was -79.50%, smaller than the maximum CCO.TO drawdown of -83.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGML and CCO.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SGML vs. CCO.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Sigma Lithium Resources Corp (SGML) is 13.02%, while Cameco Corporation (CCO.TO) has a volatility of 20.59%. This indicates that SGML experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CCO.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
SGML vs. CCO.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sigma Lithium Resources Corp and Cameco Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities