SGISX vs. VGPMX
Compare and contrast key facts about Crossmark Steward Global Equity Income Fund (SGISX) and Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund (VGPMX).
SGISX is managed by Crossmark Steward Funds. It was launched on Apr 2, 2008. VGPMX is managed by Vanguard. It was launched on May 23, 1984.
Performance
SGISX vs. VGPMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SGISX vs. VGPMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGISX Crossmark Steward Global Equity Income Fund | -1.11% | 21.79% | 9.34% | 15.60% | -11.27% | 19.46% | 8.55% | 24.76% | -7.78% | 22.36% |
VGPMX Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund | 7.85% | 65.96% | 5.78% | 10.06% | 7.34% | 19.50% | 17.21% | 20.67% | -32.26% | 13.75% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SGISX achieves a -1.11% return, which is significantly lower than VGPMX's 7.85% return. Over the past 10 years, SGISX has underperformed VGPMX with an annualized return of 10.33%, while VGPMX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.75% annualized return.
SGISX
- 1D
- 2.34%
- 1M
- -4.81%
- YTD
- -1.11%
- 6M
- 1.09%
- 1Y
- 16.37%
- 3Y*
- 14.05%
- 5Y*
- 7.80%
- 10Y*
- 10.33%
VGPMX
- 1D
- 3.18%
- 1M
- -6.80%
- YTD
- 7.85%
- 6M
- 20.12%
- 1Y
- 61.74%
- 3Y*
- 25.56%
- 5Y*
- 19.42%
- 10Y*
- 12.75%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SGISX vs. VGPMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SGISX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than VGPMX's 0.36% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SGISX vs. VGPMX — Risk / Return Rank
SGISX
VGPMX
SGISX vs. VGPMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crossmark Steward Global Equity Income Fund (SGISX) and Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund (VGPMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SGISX | VGPMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.00 | 3.21 | -2.21 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.48 | 3.80 | -2.32 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.61 | -0.40 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.44 | 4.79 | -3.34 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.70 | 19.71 | -13.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SGISX | VGPMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 | 3.21 | -2.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | 1.14 | -0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | 0.59 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.25 | +0.41 |
Correlation
The correlation between SGISX and VGPMX is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
SGISX vs. VGPMX - Dividend Comparison
SGISX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.45%, more than VGPMX's 3.62% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGISX Crossmark Steward Global Equity Income Fund | 6.45% | 6.35% | 5.08% | 2.67% | 8.68% | 16.69% | 2.43% | 7.94% | 10.59% | 7.58% | 6.99% | 8.32% |
VGPMX Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund | 3.62% | 2.59% | 2.68% | 3.22% | 3.27% | 3.26% | 2.03% | 2.39% | 3.02% | 0.02% | 1.72% | 2.32% |
Drawdowns
SGISX vs. VGPMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SGISX drawdown since its inception was -35.59%, smaller than the maximum VGPMX drawdown of -78.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGISX and VGPMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SGISX | VGPMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.59% | -78.85% | +43.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.12% | -12.80% | +0.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.76% | -22.71% | +0.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.59% | -54.59% | +19.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.01% | -7.89% | +1.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.79% | -34.68% | +30.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.61% | 3.11% | -0.50% |
Volatility
SGISX vs. VGPMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Crossmark Steward Global Equity Income Fund (SGISX) is 5.23%, while Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund (VGPMX) has a volatility of 8.37%. This indicates that SGISX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGPMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SGISX | VGPMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.23% | 8.37% | -3.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.73% | 13.47% | -3.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.88% | 19.47% | -2.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.96% | 17.21% | -2.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.64% | 21.67% | -5.03% |