PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SGISX vs. SNTCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SGISX vs. SNTCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Crossmark Steward Global Equity Income Fund (SGISX) and Crossmark Steward International Enhanced Index Fund (SNTCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SGISX achieves a 14.21% return, which is significantly higher than SNTCX's 12.37% return. Over the past 10 years, SGISX has outperformed SNTCX with an annualized return of 11.78%, while SNTCX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.27% annualized return.


SGISX

1D
1.47%
1M
9.28%
YTD
14.21%
6M
14.36%
1Y
28.38%
3Y*
19.55%
5Y*
10.10%
10Y*
11.78%

SNTCX

1D
1.13%
1M
5.81%
YTD
12.37%
6M
13.60%
1Y
29.72%
3Y*
21.03%
5Y*
10.33%
10Y*
10.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SGISX vs. SNTCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SGISX
Crossmark Steward Global Equity Income Fund
14.21%21.79%9.34%15.60%-11.27%19.46%8.55%24.76%-7.78%22.36%
SNTCX
Crossmark Steward International Enhanced Index Fund
12.37%33.58%8.58%17.60%-11.61%10.82%4.89%18.97%-13.17%23.33%

Correlation

The correlation between SGISX and SNTCX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2012

0.87

The correlation between SGISX and SNTCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SGISX vs. SNTCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SGISX
SGISX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
SGISX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGISX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGISX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
SGISX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGISX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

SNTCX
SNTCX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
SNTCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SNTCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
SNTCX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
SNTCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
SNTCX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SGISX vs. SNTCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crossmark Steward Global Equity Income Fund (SGISX) and Crossmark Steward International Enhanced Index Fund (SNTCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SGISXSNTCXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.33

1.99

+0.35

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.21

2.76

+0.45

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.36

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.64

2.79

+0.85

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.04

10.46

+3.58

SGISX vs. SNTCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SGISX Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is comparable to the SNTCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SGISX and SNTCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SGISXSNTCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.33

1.99

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.60

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

0.56

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

0.23

+0.50

Drawdowns

SGISX vs. SNTCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SGISX drawdown since its inception was -35.59%, smaller than the maximum SNTCX drawdown of -60.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGISX and SNTCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SGISXSNTCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.59%

-60.58%

+24.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.16%

-10.60%

+2.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.71%

-15.26%

+0.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.76%

-27.08%

+5.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.59%

-39.33%

+3.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.76%

-16.09%

+12.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.11%

2.82%

-0.71%

Volatility

SGISX vs. SNTCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Crossmark Steward Global Equity Income Fund (SGISX) is 4.17%, while Crossmark Steward International Enhanced Index Fund (SNTCX) has a volatility of 4.92%. This indicates that SGISX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SNTCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SGISXSNTCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.17%

4.92%

-0.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.61%

12.43%

-2.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.73%

14.88%

-2.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.02%

17.33%

-2.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.68%

18.26%

-1.58%

SGISX vs. SNTCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SGISX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than SNTCX's 0.76% expense ratio.


Dividends

SGISX vs. SNTCX - Dividend Comparison

SGISX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.58%, less than SNTCX's 7.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SGISX
Crossmark Steward Global Equity Income Fund
5.58%6.35%5.08%2.67%8.68%16.69%2.43%7.94%10.59%7.58%6.99%8.32%
SNTCX
Crossmark Steward International Enhanced Index Fund
7.00%7.86%18.31%4.23%3.17%4.75%3.96%2.59%2.47%2.27%2.29%4.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


SGISX and SNTCX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SNTCX has higher volatility (4.92%) compared to SGISX (4.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SGISX dropped -35.59% vs SNTCX's -60.58%.

SGISX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SGISX and SNTCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer