SGISX vs. SEACX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

SGISX (Crossmark Steward Global Equity Income Fund) and SEACX (Crossmark Steward Select Bond Fund) are both mutual funds - SGISX is a Global Equities fund managed by Crossmark Steward Funds, while SEACX is a Short-Term Bond fund managed by Crossmark Steward Funds. Over the past 10 years, SGISX returned 11.64%/yr vs 1.07%/yr for SEACX. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. SGISX charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.72%/yr for SEACX.

Performance

SGISX vs. SEACX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Crossmark Steward Global Equity Income Fund (SGISX) and Crossmark Steward Select Bond Fund (SEACX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SGISX achieves a 10.08% return, which is significantly higher than SEACX's -0.21% return. Over the past 10 years, SGISX has outperformed SEACX with an annualized return of 11.64%, while SEACX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.07% annualized return.

SGISX

• 1D: 0.24%
• 1M: 1.97%
• YTD: 10.08%
• 6M: 9.15%
• 1Y: 22.80%
• 3Y*: 18.05%
• 5Y*: 9.73%
• 10Y*: 11.64%

SEACX

• 1D: -0.27%
• 1M: 0.56%
• YTD: -0.21%
• 6M: 0.01%
• 1Y: 3.52%
• 3Y*: 3.68%
• 5Y*: 0.03%
• 10Y*: 1.07%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SGISX vs. SEACX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SGISX Crossmark Steward Global Equity Income Fund	10.08%	21.79%	9.34%	15.60%	-11.27%	19.46%	8.55%	24.76%	-7.78%	22.36%
SEACX Crossmark Steward Select Bond Fund	-0.21%	6.50%	1.43%	5.54%	-11.55%	-2.01%	4.97%	6.96%	-0.12%	2.24%

Correlation

The correlation between SGISX and SEACX is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.35
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.27
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.19
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.05
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2012	-0.02

The correlation between SGISX and SEACX shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (all time) to 0.35 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

SGISX vs. SEACX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SGISX

SGISX Risk / Return Rank: 48
SGISX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
SGISX Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
SGISX Omega Ratio Rank: 40
SGISX Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
SGISX Martin Ratio Rank: 55

SEACX

SEACX Risk / Return Rank: 16
SEACX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
SEACX Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
SEACX Omega Ratio Rank: 14
SEACX Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
SEACX Martin Ratio Rank: 15

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SGISX vs. SEACX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crossmark Steward Global Equity Income Fund (SGISX) and Crossmark Steward Select Bond Fund (SEACX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SGISX	SEACX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.78	1.05	+0.73
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.45	1.56	+0.89
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.18	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.89	1.43	+1.46
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.51	3.88	+6.63

SGISX vs. SEACX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SGISX Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is higher than the SEACX Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SGISX and SEACX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SGISX vs. SEACX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SGISX drawdown since its inception was -35.59%, which is greater than SEACX's maximum drawdown of -16.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGISX and SEACX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SGISX	SEACX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.59%	-16.96%	-18.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.16%	-2.66%	-5.50%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.71%	-3.90%	-10.81%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.76%	-16.34%	-5.42%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.59%	-16.96%	-18.63%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.62%	-1.71%	-1.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.75%	-2.40%	-1.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.24%	0.98%	+1.26%

Volatility

SGISX vs. SEACX - Volatility Comparison

Crossmark Steward Global Equity Income Fund (SGISX) has a higher volatility of 5.54% compared to Crossmark Steward Select Bond Fund (SEACX) at 1.04%. This indicates that SGISX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SEACX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SGISX	SEACX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.54%	1.04%	+4.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.35%	2.69%	+7.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.28%	3.65%	+9.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.10%	4.86%	+10.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.72%	3.91%	+12.81%

SGISX vs. SEACX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SGISX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than SEACX's 0.72% expense ratio.

Dividends

SGISX vs. SEACX - Dividend Comparison

SGISX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.93%, more than SEACX's 3.42% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SEACX Crossmark Steward Select Bond Fund	3.42%	2.72%	2.78%	2.06%	1.67%	1.41%	1.86%	2.26%	2.22%	1.98%	2.18%	2.30%
SGISX Crossmark Steward Global Equity Income Fund	5.93%	6.35%	5.08%	2.67%	8.68%	16.69%	2.43%	7.94%	10.59%	7.58%	6.99%	8.32%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SGISX and SEACX in my portfolio?

SGISX and SEACX have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SGISX or SEACX?

SGISX has higher volatility (5.54%) compared to SEACX (1.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SGISX dropped -35.59% vs SEACX's -16.96%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SGISX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.