PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SGISX vs. SVAAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SGISX vs. SVAAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Crossmark Steward Global Equity Income Fund (SGISX) and Federated Hermes Strategic Value Dividend Fund Class A (SVAAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SGISX achieves a 12.19% return, which is significantly lower than SVAAX's 15.31% return. Over the past 10 years, SGISX has outperformed SVAAX with an annualized return of 11.16%, while SVAAX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.12% annualized return.


SGISX

1D
0.96%
1M
2.92%
6M
9.80%
YTD
12.19%
1Y
24.95%
3Y*
16.39%
5Y*
9.71%
10Y*
11.16%
ALL TIME*
11.09%

SVAAX

1D
-1.50%
1M
2.45%
6M
9.65%
YTD
15.31%
1Y
24.12%
3Y*
15.87%
5Y*
11.50%
10Y*
8.12%
ALL TIME*
7.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

SGISX vs. SVAAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SGISX
Crossmark Steward Global Equity Income Fund
12.19%21.79%9.34%15.60%-11.27%19.46%8.55%24.76%-7.78%22.36%
SVAAX
Federated Hermes Strategic Value Dividend Fund Class A
15.31%14.42%16.29%-2.07%8.07%21.36%-8.15%19.42%-8.44%14.69%

Correlation

The correlation between SGISX and SVAAX is 0.29, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2012

0.73

Over the past year, the correlation between SGISX and SVAAX has dropped to 0.29 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SGISX vs. SVAAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SGISX
SGISX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
SGISX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGISX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGISX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
SGISX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGISX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

SVAAX
SVAAX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
SVAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SVAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
SVAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
SVAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
SVAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SGISX vs. SVAAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crossmark Steward Global Equity Income Fund (SGISX) and Federated Hermes Strategic Value Dividend Fund Class A (SVAAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SGISXSVAAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.42

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.71

5.91

-3.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.02

15.70

-6.69

SGISX vs. SVAAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SGISX Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is lower than the SVAAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SGISX and SVAAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SGISX vs. SVAAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SGISX drawdown since its inception was -35.59%, smaller than the maximum SVAAX drawdown of -51.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGISX and SVAAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SGISXSVAAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.59%

-51.16%

+15.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.16%

-4.71%

-3.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.71%

-12.84%

-1.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.76%

-16.17%

-5.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.59%

-36.47%

+0.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.77%

-1.50%

-0.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.75%

-8.15%

+4.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.45%

1.69%

+0.76%

Volatility

SGISX vs. SVAAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Crossmark Steward Global Equity Income Fund (SGISX) is 3.39%, while Federated Hermes Strategic Value Dividend Fund Class A (SVAAX) has a volatility of 4.57%. This indicates that SGISX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SVAAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SGISXSVAAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.39%

4.57%

-1.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.47%

8.70%

+1.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.33%

11.31%

+2.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.10%

13.80%

+1.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.65%

15.44%

+1.21%

SGISX vs. SVAAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SGISX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than SVAAX's 1.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

SGISX vs. SVAAX - Dividend Comparison

SGISX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.82%, more than SVAAX's 5.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SGISX
Crossmark Steward Global Equity Income Fund
5.82%6.35%5.08%2.67%8.68%16.69%2.43%7.94%10.59%7.58%6.99%8.32%
SVAAX
Federated Hermes Strategic Value Dividend Fund Class A
5.62%5.80%7.38%4.10%9.49%3.50%4.06%8.55%8.39%10.16%5.00%8.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


SGISX and SVAAX have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SVAAX has higher volatility (4.57%) compared to SGISX (3.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SGISX dropped -35.59% vs SVAAX's -51.16%.

SVAAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SGISX and SVAAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer