SVAAX vs. FGSKX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

SVAAX (Federated Hermes Strategic Value Dividend Fund Class A) and FGSKX (Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund Class R6) are both mutual funds - SVAAX is a Dividend fund actively managed by Federated Hermes, while FGSKX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Federated Hermes. Both are actively managed. Over the past 10 years, SVAAX returned 7.92%/yr vs 15.82%/yr for FGSKX. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SVAAX charges 1.06%/yr vs 0.84%/yr for FGSKX.

Performance

SVAAX vs. FGSKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes Strategic Value Dividend Fund Class A (SVAAX) and Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund Class R6 (FGSKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SVAAX achieves a 8.88% return, which is significantly higher than FGSKX's 0.25% return. Over the past 10 years, SVAAX has underperformed FGSKX with an annualized return of 7.92%, while FGSKX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.82% annualized return.

SVAAX

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: -2.30%
• YTD: 8.88%
• 6M: 8.70%
• 1Y: 19.26%
• 3Y*: 14.99%
• 5Y*: 10.29%
• 10Y*: 7.92%

FGSKX

• 1D: 0.43%
• 1M: 0.81%
• YTD: 0.25%
• 6M: -0.64%
• 1Y: 3.16%
• 3Y*: 19.05%
• 5Y*: 9.72%
• 10Y*: 15.82%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SVAAX vs. FGSKX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SVAAX Federated Hermes Strategic Value Dividend Fund Class A	8.88%	14.42%	16.29%	-2.07%	8.07%	21.36%	-8.15%	19.42%	-8.44%	14.69%
FGSKX Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund Class R6	0.25%	10.90%	33.36%	27.45%	-24.38%	22.74%	35.92%	28.35%	-3.00%	24.68%

Correlation

The correlation between SVAAX and FGSKX is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.03
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.25
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.38
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.42
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2006	0.59

Over the past year, the correlation between SVAAX and FGSKX has dropped to 0.03 - well below their long-term average of 0.59, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

SVAAX vs. FGSKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SVAAX

SVAAX Risk / Return Rank: 77
SVAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
SVAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
SVAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 60
SVAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
SVAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 79

FGSKX

FGSKX Risk / Return Rank: 5
FGSKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
FGSKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
FGSKX Omega Ratio Rank: 5
FGSKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
FGSKX Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SVAAX vs. FGSKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Strategic Value Dividend Fund Class A (SVAAX) and Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund Class R6 (FGSKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SVAAX	FGSKX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.32	0.23	+2.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.33	0.47	+2.86
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.06	+0.33
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.23	0.29	+4.94
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.83	0.78	+13.05

SVAAX vs. FGSKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SVAAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is higher than the FGSKX Sharpe Ratio of 0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SVAAX and FGSKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SVAAX vs. FGSKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SVAAX drawdown since its inception was -51.16%, smaller than the maximum FGSKX drawdown of -55.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SVAAX and FGSKX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SVAAX	FGSKX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.16%	-55.05%	+3.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.71%	-14.01%	+9.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.84%	-24.47%	+11.63%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.17%	-35.68%	+19.51%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.47%	-37.16%	+0.69%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.27%	-4.77%	+1.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.19%	-10.84%	+2.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.72%	5.24%	-3.52%

Volatility

SVAAX vs. FGSKX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Federated Hermes Strategic Value Dividend Fund Class A (SVAAX) is 3.90%, while Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund Class R6 (FGSKX) has a volatility of 5.41%. This indicates that SVAAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FGSKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SVAAX	FGSKX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.90%	5.41%	-1.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.73%	13.24%	-5.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.66%	17.61%	-6.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.68%	22.50%	-8.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.42%	22.41%	-6.99%

SVAAX vs. FGSKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SVAAX has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than FGSKX's 0.84% expense ratio.

Dividends

SVAAX vs. FGSKX - Dividend Comparison

SVAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.87%, more than FGSKX's 5.35% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FGSKX Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund Class R6	5.35%	5.37%	4.70%	0.00%	2.52%	28.15%	7.60%	8.72%	15.47%	14.82%	0.89%	26.74%
SVAAX Federated Hermes Strategic Value Dividend Fund Class A	5.87%	5.80%	7.38%	4.10%	9.49%	3.50%	4.06%	8.55%	8.39%	10.16%	5.00%	8.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SVAAX and FGSKX in my portfolio?

SVAAX and FGSKX have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SVAAX or FGSKX?

FGSKX has higher volatility (5.41%) compared to SVAAX (3.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SVAAX dropped -51.16% vs FGSKX's -55.05%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SVAAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.