PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SVAAX vs. QALGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SVAAX vs. QALGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes Strategic Value Dividend Fund Class A (SVAAX) and Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth Fund Class A (QALGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SVAAX achieves a 8.72% return, which is significantly higher than QALGX's 5.10% return. Over the past 10 years, SVAAX has underperformed QALGX with an annualized return of 7.76%, while QALGX has yielded a comparatively higher 19.67% annualized return.


SVAAX

1D
-0.58%
1M
-2.44%
YTD
8.72%
6M
8.72%
1Y
19.67%
3Y*
14.02%
5Y*
10.49%
10Y*
7.76%

QALGX

1D
1.43%
1M
-0.44%
YTD
5.10%
6M
4.89%
1Y
21.94%
3Y*
25.42%
5Y*
17.04%
10Y*
19.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SVAAX vs. QALGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SVAAX
Federated Hermes Strategic Value Dividend Fund Class A
8.72%14.42%16.29%-2.07%8.07%21.36%-8.15%19.42%-8.44%14.69%
QALGX
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth Fund Class A
5.10%19.14%40.93%39.32%-25.07%30.14%38.00%31.73%1.24%25.16%

Correlation

The correlation between SVAAX and QALGX is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2006

0.59

Over the past year, the correlation between SVAAX and QALGX has dropped to 0.00 - well below their long-term average of 0.59, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SVAAX vs. QALGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SVAAX
SVAAX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
SVAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SVAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
SVAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
SVAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
SVAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

QALGX
QALGX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
QALGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QALGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
QALGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
QALGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
QALGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SVAAX vs. QALGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Strategic Value Dividend Fund Class A (SVAAX) and Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth Fund Class A (QALGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SVAAXQALGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.26

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.22

1.35

+3.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.86

4.18

+9.68

SVAAX vs. QALGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SVAAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is higher than the QALGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SVAAX and QALGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SVAAX vs. QALGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SVAAX drawdown since its inception was -51.16%, roughly equal to the maximum QALGX drawdown of -53.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SVAAX and QALGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SVAAXQALGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.16%

-53.63%

+2.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.71%

-15.86%

+11.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.84%

-25.02%

+12.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.17%

-30.12%

+13.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.47%

-31.73%

-4.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.41%

-4.14%

+0.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.19%

-9.15%

+0.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.71%

5.11%

-3.40%

Volatility

SVAAX vs. QALGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Federated Hermes Strategic Value Dividend Fund Class A (SVAAX) is 3.93%, while Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth Fund Class A (QALGX) has a volatility of 6.33%. This indicates that SVAAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QALGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SVAAXQALGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.93%

6.33%

-2.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.84%

13.16%

-5.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.66%

17.09%

-6.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.70%

21.26%

-7.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.42%

21.40%

-5.98%

SVAAX vs. QALGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SVAAX has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than QALGX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

SVAAX vs. QALGX - Dividend Comparison

SVAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.88%, more than QALGX's 3.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QALGX
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth Fund Class A
3.26%3.42%7.26%1.59%14.79%20.92%7.92%5.33%10.82%7.70%0.57%12.13%
SVAAX
Federated Hermes Strategic Value Dividend Fund Class A
5.88%5.80%7.38%4.10%9.49%3.50%4.06%8.55%8.39%10.16%5.00%8.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


SVAAX and QALGX have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QALGX has higher volatility (6.33%) compared to SVAAX (3.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SVAAX dropped -51.16% vs QALGX's -53.63%.

SVAAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SVAAX and QALGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer