SVAAX vs. AMINX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

SVAAX (Federated Hermes Strategic Value Dividend Fund Class A) and AMINX (Amana Income Fund Institutional Class) are both Dividend funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 10 years, SVAAX returned 8.12%/yr vs 12.05%/yr for AMINX. Their 0.66 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. SVAAX charges 1.06%/yr vs 0.76%/yr for AMINX.

Performance

SVAAX vs. AMINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes Strategic Value Dividend Fund Class A (SVAAX) and Amana Income Fund Institutional Class (AMINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SVAAX achieves a 15.31% return, which is significantly higher than AMINX's 12.82% return. Over the past 10 years, SVAAX has underperformed AMINX with an annualized return of 8.12%, while AMINX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.05% annualized return.

SVAAX

• 1D: -1.50%
• 1M: 2.45%
• 6M: 9.65%
• YTD: 15.31%
• 1Y: 24.12%
• 3Y*: 15.87%
• 5Y*: 11.50%
• 10Y*: 8.12%
• ALL TIME*: 7.75%

AMINX

• 1D: 1.61%
• 1M: -0.29%
• 6M: 10.38%
• YTD: 12.82%
• 1Y: 21.50%
• 3Y*: 15.37%
• 5Y*: 10.98%
• 10Y*: 12.05%
• ALL TIME*: 11.04%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AMINX Amana Income Fund Institutional Class	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
SVAAX Federated Hermes Strategic Value Dividend Fund Class A	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

SVAAX vs. AMINX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SVAAX Federated Hermes Strategic Value Dividend Fund Class A	15.31%	14.42%	16.29%	-2.07%	8.07%	21.36%	-8.15%	19.42%	-8.44%	14.69%
AMINX Amana Income Fund Institutional Class	12.82%	16.69%	13.13%	13.87%	-8.65%	22.81%	14.18%	25.59%	-4.94%	21.95%

Correlation

The correlation between SVAAX and AMINX is 0.21, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.21
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.38
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.54
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.62
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014	0.66

Over the past year, the correlation between SVAAX and AMINX has dropped to 0.21 - well below their long-term average of 0.66, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

SVAAX vs. AMINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SVAAX

SVAAX Risk / Return Rank: 93
SVAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
SVAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
SVAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 85
SVAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
SVAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 95

AMINX

AMINX Risk / Return Rank: 57
AMINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
AMINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
AMINX Omega Ratio Rank: 58
AMINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
AMINX Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SVAAX vs. AMINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Strategic Value Dividend Fund Class A (SVAAX) and Amana Income Fund Institutional Class (AMINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SVAAX	AMINX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.47	1.51	+0.96
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.60	2.19	+1.41
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.27	+0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.91	1.82	+4.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.70	7.24	+8.47

SVAAX vs. AMINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SVAAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is higher than the AMINX Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SVAAX and AMINX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SVAAX vs. AMINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SVAAX drawdown since its inception was -51.16%, which is greater than AMINX's maximum drawdown of -31.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SVAAX and AMINX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SVAAX	AMINX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.16%	-31.45%	-19.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.71%	-11.00%	+6.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.84%	-15.34%	+2.50%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.17%	-19.04%	+2.87%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.47%	-31.45%	-5.02%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.50%	-1.09%	-0.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.15%	-3.61%	-4.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.69%	2.76%	-1.07%

Volatility

SVAAX vs. AMINX - Volatility Comparison

Federated Hermes Strategic Value Dividend Fund Class A (SVAAX) has a higher volatility of 4.57% compared to Amana Income Fund Institutional Class (AMINX) at 3.49%. This indicates that SVAAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SVAAX	AMINX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.57%	3.49%	+1.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.70%	10.94%	-2.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.31%	13.27%	-1.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.80%	14.08%	-0.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.44%	15.95%	-0.51%

SVAAX vs. AMINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SVAAX has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than AMINX's 0.76% expense ratio.

Dividends

SVAAX vs. AMINX - Dividend Comparison

SVAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.62%, more than AMINX's 5.16% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AMINX Amana Income Fund Institutional Class	5.16%	5.80%	6.06%	5.61%	8.61%	5.02%	6.91%	8.22%	6.87%	6.04%	4.58%	7.18%
SVAAX Federated Hermes Strategic Value Dividend Fund Class A	5.62%	5.80%	7.38%	4.10%	9.49%	3.50%	4.06%	8.55%	8.39%	10.16%	5.00%	8.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SVAAX and AMINX in my portfolio?

SVAAX and AMINX have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SVAAX or AMINX?

SVAAX has higher volatility (4.57%) compared to AMINX (3.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SVAAX dropped -51.16% vs AMINX's -31.45%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SVAAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.