SGDM vs. VYM
SGDM (Sprott Gold Miners ETF) and VYM (Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SGDM is a Gold fund tracking the Solactive Gold Miners Custom Factors Index, while VYM is a Dividend fund tracking the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SGDM returned 11.84%/yr vs 11.95%/yr for VYM. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SGDM charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VYM.
Performance
SGDM vs. VYM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SGDM achieves a -4.58% return, which is significantly lower than VYM's 12.37% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SGDM having a 11.84% annualized return and VYM not far ahead at 11.95%.
SGDM
- 1D
- 3.49%
- 1M
- -14.98%
- YTD
- -4.58%
- 6M
- -4.02%
- 1Y
- 43.72%
- 3Y*
- 37.20%
- 5Y*
- 17.23%
- 10Y*
- 11.84%
VYM
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- 1.97%
- YTD
- 12.37%
- 6M
- 11.19%
- 1Y
- 25.94%
- 3Y*
- 18.06%
- 5Y*
- 11.59%
- 10Y*
- 11.95%
SGDM vs. VYM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGDM Sprott Gold Miners ETF | -4.58% | 153.46% | 12.14% | 2.34% | -8.23% | -9.15% | 21.85% | 44.27% | -15.14% | 10.46% |
VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF | 12.37% | 15.42% | 17.60% | 6.57% | -0.43% | 26.20% | 1.15% | 24.06% | -5.92% | 16.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between SGDM and VYM is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2014 | 0.16 |
The correlation between SGDM and VYM shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (all time) to 0.33 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SGDM vs. VYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SGDM
VYM
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
SGDM
VYM
Communication Services
SGDM
-
VYM
Consumer Cyclical
SGDM
-
VYM
Consumer Defensive
SGDM
-
VYM
Energy
SGDM
-
VYM
Financial Services
SGDM
-
VYM
Healthcare
SGDM
-
VYM
Industrials
SGDM
-
VYM
Real Estate
SGDM
-
VYM
Technology
SGDM
-
VYM
Utilities
SGDM
-
VYM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SGDM vs. VYM — Risk / Return Rank
SGDM
VYM
SGDM vs. VYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Gold Miners ETF (SGDM) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SGDM | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.42 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.30 | 3.70 | -2.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.60 | 13.81 | -10.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SGDM vs. VYM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SGDM drawdown since its inception was -54.95%, roughly equal to the maximum VYM drawdown of -56.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGDM and VYM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SGDM | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.95% | -56.98% | +2.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.96% | -6.69% | -29.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.96% | -14.46% | -21.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.06% | -15.84% | -29.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.69% | -35.21% | -14.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.31% | -0.52% | -29.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.46% | -7.18% | -18.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.93% | 1.80% | +11.13% |
Volatility
SGDM vs. VYM - Volatility Comparison
Sprott Gold Miners ETF (SGDM) has a higher volatility of 16.53% compared to Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) at 3.31%. This indicates that SGDM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SGDM | VYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.53% | 3.31% | +13.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.64% | 7.81% | +30.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.24% | 10.47% | +35.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.11% | 13.99% | +22.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.97% | 16.35% | +20.62% |
SGDM vs. VYM - Expense Ratio Comparison
SGDM has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than VYM's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
SGDM vs. VYM - Dividend Comparison
SGDM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, less than VYM's 2.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGDM Sprott Gold Miners ETF | 1.09% | 1.04% | 1.04% | 1.39% | 1.42% | 1.33% | 0.30% | 0.25% | 0.50% | 0.58% | 0.02% | 1.47% |
VYM Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF | 2.19% | 2.44% | 2.74% | 3.12% | 3.01% | 2.76% | 3.18% | 3.03% | 3.40% | 2.80% | 2.91% | 3.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SGDM and VYM have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SGDM has higher volatility (16.53%) compared to VYM (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SGDM dropped -54.95% vs VYM's -56.98%.
On 10-year performance, VYM leads with 11.95% vs 11.84% for SGDM. On fees, VYM is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VYM has been the lower-risk option at 3.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VYM has performed better with a 11.95% return vs 11.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VYM is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SGDM.
VYM has the higher dividend yield at 2.19%, compared with 1.09% for SGDM.
SGDM is categorized as Gold, while VYM is Dividend. SGDM tracks Solactive Gold Miners Custom Factors Index, while VYM tracks FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: Sprott and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for SGDM and 0.04% for VYM.
VYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SGDM and VYM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer