SGDM vs. RING
Compare and contrast key facts about Sprott Gold Miners ETF (SGDM) and iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING).
SGDM and RING are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SGDM is a passively managed fund by Sprott that tracks the performance of the Solactive Gold Miners Custom Factors Index. It was launched on Jul 15, 2014. RING is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI Select Gold Miners Investable Market Index. It was launched on Jan 31, 2012. Both SGDM and RING are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SGDM or RING.
Correlation
The correlation between SGDM and RING is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
SGDM vs. RING - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
SGDM:
1.68
RING:
1.48
SGDM:
2.23
RING:
2.00
SGDM:
1.29
RING:
1.26
SGDM:
1.80
RING:
1.24
SGDM:
6.80
RING:
5.36
SGDM:
7.83%
RING:
9.32%
SGDM:
31.75%
RING:
33.88%
SGDM:
-54.95%
RING:
-79.48%
SGDM:
-8.28%
RING:
-10.77%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SGDM achieves a 43.33% return, which is significantly higher than RING's 39.91% return. Over the past 10 years, SGDM has underperformed RING with an annualized return of 9.24%, while RING has yielded a comparatively higher 10.83% annualized return.
SGDM
43.33%
4.52%
29.14%
52.53%
6.96%
9.24%
RING
39.91%
2.85%
21.89%
48.41%
8.44%
10.83%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SGDM vs. RING - Expense Ratio Comparison
SGDM has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than RING's 0.39% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SGDM vs. RING — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
SGDM
RING
SGDM vs. RING - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Gold Miners ETF (SGDM) and iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SGDM vs. RING - Dividend Comparison
SGDM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, less than RING's 1.02% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGDM Sprott Gold Miners ETF | 0.73% | 1.04% | 1.39% | 1.42% | 1.33% | 0.30% | 0.25% | 0.50% | 0.57% | 0.02% | 1.47% | 0.26% |
RING iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF | 1.02% | 1.43% | 2.01% | 2.29% | 2.38% | 0.82% | 0.83% | 0.70% | 0.42% | 1.42% | 0.97% | 0.85% |
Drawdowns
SGDM vs. RING - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SGDM drawdown since its inception was -54.95%, smaller than the maximum RING drawdown of -79.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGDM and RING. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SGDM vs. RING - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Sprott Gold Miners ETF (SGDM) is 15.37%, while iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING) has a volatility of 16.70%. This indicates that SGDM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RING based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.