SFYI vs. RDTE
SFYI (SoFi Social 50 Income ETF) and RDTE (Roundhill Russell 2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SFYI charges 0.73%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for RDTE.
Performance
SFYI vs. RDTE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SFYI
- 1D
- -1.08%
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RDTE
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- 3.36%
- 6M
- 11.88%
- YTD
- 18.28%
- 1Y
- 26.47%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SFYI vs. RDTE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SFYI SoFi Social 50 Income ETF | -1.98% |
RDTE Roundhill Russell 2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | -0.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between SFYI and RDTE is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2026 | 0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SFYI vs. RDTE — Risk / Return Rank
SFYI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
RDTE
SFYI vs. RDTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SoFi Social 50 Income ETF (SFYI) and Roundhill Russell 2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SFYI | RDTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.27 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.90 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.06 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SFYI vs. RDTE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SFYI drawdown since its inception was -3.16%, smaller than the maximum RDTE drawdown of -24.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFYI and RDTE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SFYI | RDTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.16% | -24.32% | +21.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.17% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.16% | -0.89% | -2.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.04% | -4.41% | +3.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.64% | — |
Volatility
SFYI vs. RDTE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SFYI | RDTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.53% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.03% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.76% | 16.97% | -3.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.76% | 19.03% | -5.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.76% | 19.03% | -5.27% |
SFYI vs. RDTE - Expense Ratio Comparison
SFYI has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is lower than RDTE's 0.97% expense ratio.
Dividends
SFYI vs. RDTE - Dividend Comparison
SFYI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RDTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 44.22%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
RDTE Roundhill Russell 2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | 44.22% | 50.16% | 10.70% |
SFYI SoFi Social 50 Income ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SFYI and RDTE have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SFYI is cheaper at 0.73% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SFYI is cheaper with a 0.73% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for RDTE.
RDTE has the higher dividend yield at 44.22%, compared with 0.00% for SFYI.
They also come from different issuers: Tidal and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.73% for SFYI and 0.97% for RDTE.
Find the right allocation for SFYI and RDTE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer