PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SFYI vs. ACYS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SFYI vs. ACYS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SoFi Social 50 Income ETF (SFYI) and FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF (ACYS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


SFYI

1D
-0.21%
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

ACYS

1D
0.15%
1M
0.55%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$8.49M$7.53M$5.92M
$69.84K$123.60K$123.60K

SFYI vs. ACYS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SFYI and ACYS is 0.52, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2026

0.52

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SFYI vs. ACYS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SoFi Social 50 Income ETF (SFYI) and FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF (ACYS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SFYI vs. ACYS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SFYI vs. ACYS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SFYI drawdown since its inception was -6.33%, which is greater than ACYS's maximum drawdown of -0.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFYI and ACYS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SFYIACYSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.33%

-0.78%

-5.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.02%

-0.24%

-5.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.53%

-0.17%

-2.36%

Volatility

SFYI vs. ACYS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SFYIACYSDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.71%

3.68%

+13.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.71%

3.68%

+13.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.71%

3.68%

+13.03%

SFYI vs. ACYS - Expense Ratio Comparison

SFYI has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is lower than ACYS's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

SFYI vs. ACYS - Dividend Comparison

SFYI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ACYS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SFYI and ACYS have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SFYI is cheaper at 0.73% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SFYI is cheaper with a 0.73% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ACYS.

ACYS has the higher dividend yield at 0.60%, compared with 0.00% for SFYI.

They also come from different issuers: Tidal and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.73% for SFYI and 0.75% for ACYS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SFYI and ACYS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer