SFYF vs. RPAR

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

SFYF (SoFi Social 50 ETF) and RPAR (RPAR Risk Parity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SFYF is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the SoFi Social 50 Index, while RPAR is a Hedge Fund fund actively managed by Toroso Investments. SFYF is passively managed, while RPAR is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, SFYF returned 9.54%/yr vs 1.27%/yr for RPAR. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SFYF charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.51%/yr for RPAR.

Performance

SFYF vs. RPAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SoFi Social 50 ETF (SFYF) and RPAR Risk Parity ETF (RPAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SFYF achieves a 6.40% return, which is significantly higher than RPAR's 5.18% return.

SFYF

• 1D: -0.77%
• 1M: -6.35%
• YTD: 6.40%
• 6M: 4.11%
• 1Y: 29.18%
• 3Y*: 32.16%
• 5Y*: 9.54%
• 10Y*: —

RPAR

• 1D: 0.39%
• 1M: -1.37%
• YTD: 5.18%
• 6M: 3.87%
• 1Y: 15.72%
• 3Y*: 8.05%
• 5Y*: 1.27%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SFYF vs. RPAR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
SFYF SoFi Social 50 ETF	6.40%	30.00%	44.62%	56.80%	-47.73%	35.83%	33.65%	2.04%
RPAR RPAR Risk Parity ETF	5.18%	17.91%	0.06%	6.03%	-22.82%	7.56%	19.40%	0.13%

Correlation

The correlation between SFYF and RPAR is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.44
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2019	0.45

The correlation between SFYF and RPAR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.44 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SFYF vs. RPAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SFYF

SFYF Risk / Return Rank: 45
SFYF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
SFYF Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
SFYF Omega Ratio Rank: 46
SFYF Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
SFYF Martin Ratio Rank: 43

RPAR

RPAR Risk / Return Rank: 46
RPAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
RPAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
RPAR Omega Ratio Rank: 47
RPAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
RPAR Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SFYF vs. RPAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SoFi Social 50 ETF (SFYF) and RPAR Risk Parity ETF (RPAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SFYF	RPAR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.49	1.50	0.00
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.00	2.09	-0.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.27	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.93	1.95	-0.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.12	5.91	+0.21

SFYF vs. RPAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SFYF Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is comparable to the RPAR Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SFYF and RPAR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SFYF vs. RPAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SFYF drawdown since its inception was -56.09%, which is greater than RPAR's maximum drawdown of -30.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFYF and RPAR.

Drawdown Indicators

	SFYF	RPAR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.09%	-30.16%	-25.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.18%	-8.10%	-7.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.45%	-13.20%	-13.25%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-56.09%	-30.16%	-25.93%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.92%	-4.76%	-4.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.48%	-11.54%	-4.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.78%	2.67%	+2.11%

Volatility

SFYF vs. RPAR - Volatility Comparison

SoFi Social 50 ETF (SFYF) has a higher volatility of 8.04% compared to RPAR Risk Parity ETF (RPAR) at 3.68%. This indicates that SFYF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RPAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SFYF	RPAR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.04%	3.68%	+4.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.00%	8.92%	+6.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.64%	10.55%	+9.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.38%	12.47%	+16.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.68%	12.70%	+17.98%

SFYF vs. RPAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

SFYF has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than RPAR's 0.51% expense ratio.

Dividends

SFYF vs. RPAR - Dividend Comparison

SFYF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, less than RPAR's 2.12% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
RPAR RPAR Risk Parity ETF	2.12%	2.55%	2.51%	3.16%	4.01%	2.02%	0.76%	0.23%
SFYF SoFi Social 50 ETF	0.31%	0.33%	0.31%	1.71%	1.19%	0.26%	0.40%	0.73%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SFYF and RPAR in my portfolio?

SFYF and RPAR have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SFYF or RPAR?

SFYF has higher volatility (8.04%) compared to RPAR (3.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SFYF dropped -56.09% vs RPAR's -30.16%.

Which ETF is better, SFYF or RPAR?

On 5-year performance, SFYF leads with 9.54% vs 1.27% for RPAR. On fees, SFYF is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, RPAR has been the lower-risk option at 3.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SFYF or RPAR?

Over the 5-year period, SFYF has performed better with a 9.54% return vs 1.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SFYF or RPAR?

SFYF is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for RPAR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SFYF or RPAR?

RPAR has the higher dividend yield at 2.12%, compared with 0.31% for SFYF.

What is the main difference between SFYF and RPAR?

SFYF is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while RPAR is Hedge Fund. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for SFYF and 0.51% for RPAR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RPAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.