SFYF vs. RFDA

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SFYF (SoFi Social 50 ETF) and RFDA (RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. SFYF is passively managed, while RFDA is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, SFYF returned 12.34%/yr vs 13.17%/yr for RFDA. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SFYF charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for RFDA.

Performance

SFYF vs. RFDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SoFi Social 50 ETF (SFYF) and RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SFYF achieves a 14.85% return, which is significantly higher than RFDA's 11.40% return.

SFYF

• 1D: -0.85%
• 1M: 8.95%
• YTD: 14.85%
• 6M: 14.20%
• 1Y: 43.96%
• 3Y*: 36.32%
• 5Y*: 12.34%
• 10Y*: —

RFDA

• 1D: -0.92%
• 1M: 4.27%
• YTD: 11.40%
• 6M: 12.25%
• 1Y: 29.49%
• 3Y*: 19.19%
• 5Y*: 13.17%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SFYF vs. RFDA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
SFYF SoFi Social 50 ETF	14.85%	30.00%	44.62%	56.80%	-47.73%	35.83%	33.65%	4.95%
RFDA RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF	11.40%	16.42%	20.12%	16.98%	-8.58%	25.94%	11.26%	10.06%

Correlation

The correlation between SFYF and RFDA is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.68
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.74
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2019	0.74

The correlation between SFYF and RFDA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

SFYF vs. RFDA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SFYF	RFDA
Technology	38.5%	19.9%
Consumer Cyclical	22.9%	7.0%
Communication Services	13.8%	8.8%
Consumer Defensive	6.8%	7.6%
Financial Services	5.5%	14.7%
Healthcare	5.5%	8.8%
Industrials	3.5%	8.9%
Energy	2.1%	12.5%
Real Estate	1.2%	5.0%
Basic Materials	-	1.8%
Utilities	-	5.0%

Return for Risk

SFYF vs. RFDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SFYF

SFYF Risk / Return Rank: 63
SFYF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
SFYF Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
SFYF Omega Ratio Rank: 64
SFYF Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
SFYF Martin Ratio Rank: 55

RFDA

RFDA Risk / Return Rank: 83
RFDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
RFDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
RFDA Omega Ratio Rank: 79
RFDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
RFDA Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SFYF vs. RFDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SoFi Social 50 ETF (SFYF) and RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SFYF	RFDA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.36	2.55	-0.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.01	3.52	-0.50
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.47	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.91	5.44	-2.53
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.65	19.87	-10.22
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SFYF vs. RFDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SFYF Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is comparable to the RFDA Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SFYF and RFDA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SFYF	RFDA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.36	2.55	-0.19
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.42	0.84	-0.42
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.61	0.79	-0.18

Drawdowns

SFYF vs. RFDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SFYF drawdown since its inception was -56.09%, which is greater than RFDA's maximum drawdown of -34.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFYF and RFDA.

Drawdown Indicators

	SFYF	RFDA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.09%	-34.60%	-21.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.18%	-5.45%	-9.73%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.45%	-19.35%	-7.10%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-56.09%	-19.35%	-36.74%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.68%	-0.92%	-0.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.58%	-3.74%	-12.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.57%	1.49%	+3.08%

Volatility

SFYF vs. RFDA - Volatility Comparison

SoFi Social 50 ETF (SFYF) has a higher volatility of 5.58% compared to RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA) at 2.66%. This indicates that SFYF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RFDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SFYF	RFDA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.58%	2.66%	+2.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.21%	8.47%	+4.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.74%	11.64%	+7.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.28%	15.73%	+13.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.68%	16.85%	+13.83%

SFYF vs. RFDA - Expense Ratio Comparison

SFYF has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than RFDA's 0.52% expense ratio.

Dividends

SFYF vs. RFDA - Dividend Comparison

SFYF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%, less than RFDA's 1.77% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
RFDA RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF	1.77%	1.89%	2.23%	2.68%	3.57%	1.44%	1.62%	1.87%	2.44%	1.90%	0.98%
SFYF SoFi Social 50 ETF	0.29%	0.33%	0.31%	1.71%	1.19%	0.26%	0.40%	0.73%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SFYF and RFDA in my portfolio?

SFYF and RFDA have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SFYF or RFDA?

SFYF has higher volatility (5.58%) compared to RFDA (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SFYF dropped -56.09% vs RFDA's -34.60%.

Which ETF is better, SFYF or RFDA?

On 5-year performance, RFDA leads with 13.17% vs 12.34% for SFYF. On fees, SFYF is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, RFDA has been the lower-risk option at 2.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SFYF or RFDA?

Over the 5-year period, RFDA has performed better with a 13.17% return vs 12.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SFYF or RFDA?

SFYF is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for RFDA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SFYF or RFDA?

RFDA has the higher dividend yield at 1.77%, compared with 0.29% for SFYF.

What is the main difference between SFYF and RFDA?

They also come from different issuers: Toroso Investments and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for SFYF and 0.52% for RFDA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RFDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 2.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.