SFTY vs. WAMA
SFTY (Horizon Managed Risk ETF) and WAMA (WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SFTY charges 0.77%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for WAMA.
Performance
SFTY vs. WAMA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SFTY
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 4.71%
- YTD
- 9.84%
- 6M
- 9.81%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WAMA
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SFTY vs. WAMA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SFTY Horizon Managed Risk ETF | 2.49% |
WAMA WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund | 2.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between SFTY and WAMA is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2026 | 0.93 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SFTY vs. WAMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Managed Risk ETF (SFTY) and WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund (WAMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SFTY | WAMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.11 | 4.87 | -2.76 |
Drawdowns
SFTY vs. WAMA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SFTY drawdown since its inception was -8.64%, which is greater than WAMA's maximum drawdown of -1.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFTY and WAMA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SFTY | WAMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.64% | -1.91% | -6.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.32% | -0.73% | +0.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.10% | -0.39% | -0.71% |
Volatility
SFTY vs. WAMA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SFTY | WAMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.64% | 9.20% | +2.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.64% | 9.20% | +2.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.64% | 9.20% | +2.44% |
SFTY vs. WAMA - Expense Ratio Comparison
SFTY has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than WAMA's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
SFTY vs. WAMA - Dividend Comparison
SFTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, while WAMA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
SFTY Horizon Managed Risk ETF | 0.17% | 0.19% |
WAMA WisdomTree U.S. Adaptive Moving Average Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, SFTY and WAMA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, WAMA is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WAMA is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for SFTY.
SFTY has the higher dividend yield at 0.17%, compared with 0.00% for WAMA.
They also come from different issuers: Horizon and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.77% for SFTY and 0.32% for WAMA.
Find the right allocation for SFTY and WAMA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer