SFM vs. GGAL
SFM (Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.) and GGAL (Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A.) are both stocks. SFM operates in Grocery Stores (Consumer Defensive), while GGAL operates in Banks - Regional (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, SFM returned 14.32%/yr vs 9.37%/yr for GGAL. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SFM vs. GGAL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SFM achieves a 8.36% return, which is significantly higher than GGAL's 5.26% return. Over the past 10 years, SFM has outperformed GGAL with an annualized return of 14.32%, while GGAL has yielded a comparatively lower 9.37% annualized return.
SFM
- 1D
- -2.03%
- 1M
- -2.20%
- YTD
- 8.36%
- 6M
- 8.54%
- 1Y
- -45.03%
- 3Y*
- 35.31%
- 5Y*
- 24.38%
- 10Y*
- 14.32%
GGAL
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- 31.99%
- YTD
- 5.26%
- 6M
- 17.58%
- 1Y
- 3.10%
- 3Y*
- 62.39%
- 5Y*
- 48.50%
- 10Y*
- 9.37%
SFM vs. GGAL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SFM Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. | 8.36% | -37.30% | 164.12% | 48.63% | 9.06% | 47.66% | 3.88% | -17.69% | -3.45% | 28.70% |
GGAL Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. | 5.26% | -11.36% | 289.05% | 92.28% | 8.05% | 8.88% | -45.53% | -40.38% | -57.85% | 145.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between SFM and GGAL is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2013 | 0.10 |
The correlation between SFM and GGAL shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.10 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
SFM:
$8.25B
GGAL:
$1.55B
SFM:
$5.20
GGAL:
ARS 676.97
SFM:
16.62
GGAL:
116.68
SFM:
0.60
GGAL:
1.06
SFM:
0.95
GGAL:
0.77
SFM:
5.75
GGAL:
0.26
SFM:
$8.90B
GGAL:
ARS 13.01T
SFM:
$3.41B
GGAL:
ARS 5.27T
SFM:
$837.54M
GGAL:
ARS 306.88B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SFM vs. GGAL — Risk / Return Rank
SFM
GGAL
SFM vs. GGAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. (SFM) and Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. (GGAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SFM | GGAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.81 | 1.08 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.73 | 0.06 | -0.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.99 | 0.13 | -1.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SFM vs. GGAL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SFM drawdown since its inception was -72.88%, smaller than the maximum GGAL drawdown of -98.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFM and GGAL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SFM | GGAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.88% | -98.98% | +26.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -62.17% | -51.28% | -10.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -63.48% | -62.94% | -0.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.48% | -62.94% | -0.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.48% | -91.70% | +28.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -51.91% | -19.48% | -32.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.28% | -57.36% | +17.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 45.41% | 24.18% | +21.23% |
Volatility
SFM vs. GGAL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. (SFM) is 12.50%, while Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. (GGAL) has a volatility of 17.53%. This indicates that SFM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GGAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SFM | GGAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.50% | 17.53% | -5.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.32% | 37.08% | -6.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.09% | 75.08% | -28.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.23% | 58.54% | -19.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.82% | 62.01% | -24.19% |
Dividends
SFM vs. GGAL - Dividend Comparison
SFM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GGAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.84%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGAL Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. | 3.84% | 2.11% | 3.81% | 6.49% | 4.62% | 0.23% | 0.94% | 1.89% | 1.29% | 0.16% | 0.13% | 0.09% |
SFM Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
SFM vs. GGAL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. and Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SFM vs. GGAL - Profitability Comparison
SFM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. reported a gross profit of 917.28M and revenue of 2.33B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.4%.
GGAL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. reported a gross profit of 1.11T and revenue of 1.99T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.0%.
SFM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. reported an operating income of 215.31M and revenue of 2.33B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.2%.
GGAL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. reported an operating income of 66.60B and revenue of 1.99T, resulting in an operating margin of 3.4%.
SFM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. reported a net income of 163.72M and revenue of 2.33B, resulting in a net margin of 7.0%.
GGAL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. reported a net income of 65.18B and revenue of 1.99T, resulting in a net margin of 3.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SFM and GGAL have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GGAL has higher volatility (17.53%) compared to SFM (12.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SFM dropped -72.88% vs GGAL's -98.98%.
GGAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.04 vs -0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SFM and GGAL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer