SFLO vs. TNA

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

SFLO (Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF) and TNA (Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - SFLO is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Victory US Small Cap Free Cash Flow Index, while TNA is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Index (300% Daily). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SFLO returned 28.87% vs 125.39% for TNA. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SFLO charges 0.49%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for TNA.

Performance

SFLO vs. TNA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF (SFLO) and Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SFLO achieves a 12.77% return, which is significantly lower than TNA's 56.90% return.

SFLO

• 1D: 0.86%
• 1M: 0.50%
• YTD: 12.77%
• 6M: 11.84%
• 1Y: 28.87%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TNA

• 1D: -3.11%
• 1M: 9.59%
• YTD: 56.90%
• 6M: 45.88%
• 1Y: 125.39%
• 3Y*: 32.32%
• 5Y*: -5.98%
• 10Y*: 9.70%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SFLO vs. TNA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
SFLO Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF	12.77%	11.88%	6.54%	0.27%
TNA Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares	56.90%	9.82%	7.21%	6.39%

Correlation

The correlation between SFLO and TNA is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 21, 2023	0.82

The correlation between SFLO and TNA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

SFLO vs. TNA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SFLO	TNA
Technology	28.1%	19.1%
Healthcare	18.9%	16.3%
Consumer Cyclical	17.2%	8.0%
Energy	13.4%	5.4%
Industrials	9.1%	18.0%
Communication Services	7.0%	2.4%
Consumer Defensive	4.4%	2.3%
Basic Materials	1.7%	4.7%
Financial Services	0.2%	15.3%
Utilities	0.1%	2.7%
Real Estate	0.1%	5.9%

Return for Risk

SFLO vs. TNA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SFLO

SFLO Risk / Return Rank: 60
SFLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
SFLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
SFLO Omega Ratio Rank: 48
SFLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
SFLO Martin Ratio Rank: 69

TNA

TNA Risk / Return Rank: 65
TNA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
TNA Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
TNA Omega Ratio Rank: 50
TNA Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
TNA Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SFLO vs. TNA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF (SFLO) and Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SFLO	TNA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.67	2.15	-0.48
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.43	2.59	-0.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.31	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.72	3.88	-0.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.95	12.72	-0.77

SFLO vs. TNA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SFLO Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is comparable to the TNA Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SFLO and TNA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SFLO vs. TNA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SFLO drawdown since its inception was -26.63%, smaller than the maximum TNA drawdown of -88.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFLO and TNA.

Drawdown Indicators

	SFLO	TNA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.63%	-88.09%	+61.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.80%	-32.53%	+24.73%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-65.78%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-82.36%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-88.09%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.39%	-33.64%	+30.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.29%	-33.92%	+29.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.42%	9.89%	-7.47%

Volatility

SFLO vs. TNA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF (SFLO) is 5.20%, while Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA) has a volatility of 19.82%. This indicates that SFLO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TNA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SFLO	TNA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.20%	19.82%	-14.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.67%	42.69%	-31.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.37%	58.76%	-41.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.45%	67.57%	-47.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.45%	68.50%	-48.05%

SFLO vs. TNA - Expense Ratio Comparison

SFLO has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than TNA's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

SFLO vs. TNA - Dividend Comparison

SFLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, more than TNA's 0.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SFLO Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF	0.82%	1.04%	1.28%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TNA Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares	0.38%	0.78%	0.93%	1.27%	0.31%	0.06%	0.03%	0.44%	0.36%	0.15%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SFLO and TNA in my portfolio?

SFLO and TNA have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SFLO or TNA?

TNA has higher volatility (19.82%) compared to SFLO (5.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SFLO dropped -26.63% vs TNA's -88.09%.

Which ETF is better, SFLO or TNA?

On 1-year performance, TNA leads with 125.39% vs 28.87% for SFLO. On fees, SFLO is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, SFLO has been the lower-risk option at 5.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SFLO or TNA?

Over the 1-year period, TNA has performed better with a 125.39% return vs 28.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SFLO or TNA?

SFLO is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for TNA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SFLO or TNA?

SFLO has the higher dividend yield at 0.82%, compared with 0.38% for TNA.

What is the main difference between SFLO and TNA?

SFLO is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while TNA is Leveraged Equities. SFLO tracks Victory US Small Cap Free Cash Flow Index, while TNA tracks Russell 2000 Index (300% Daily). They also come from different issuers: Victory and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for SFLO and 1.05% for TNA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TNA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.