PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SFLO vs. CSB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SFLO vs. CSB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF (SFLO) and VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SFLO achieves a 30.25% return, which is significantly higher than CSB's 16.36% return.


SFLO

1D
1.87%
1M
8.45%
6M
27.60%
YTD
30.25%
1Y
47.01%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
18.43%

CSB

1D
0.98%
1M
2.24%
6M
9.36%
YTD
16.36%
1Y
25.64%
3Y*
11.68%
5Y*
6.54%
10Y*
10.02%
ALL TIME*
9.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$987.02K$1.11M$644.62K
$5.65M$4.19M$2.65M

SFLO vs. CSB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SFLO
Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF
30.25%11.88%6.54%0.27%
CSB
VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF
16.36%2.26%9.64%1.21%

Correlation

The correlation between SFLO and CSB is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 21, 2023

0.78

The correlation between SFLO and CSB shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.78 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SFLO vs. CSB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SFLO
CSB

Technology

32.1%
1.3%

Healthcare

16.3%
0.4%

Energy

15.4%
9.9%

Consumer Cyclical

12.6%
20.0%

Industrials

8.3%
8.5%

Communication Services

8.2%
3.8%

Consumer Defensive

6.1%
4.0%

Basic Materials

0.8%
3.7%

Financial Services

0.2%
27.5%

Utilities

0.1%
21.3%

Real Estate

0.1%

-

Technology

SFLO
32.1%
CSB
1.3%

Healthcare

SFLO
16.3%
CSB
0.4%

Energy

SFLO
15.4%
CSB
9.9%

Consumer Cyclical

SFLO
12.6%
CSB
20.0%

Industrials

SFLO
8.3%
CSB
8.5%

Communication Services

SFLO
8.2%
CSB
3.8%

Consumer Defensive

SFLO
6.1%
CSB
4.0%

Basic Materials

SFLO
0.8%
CSB
3.7%

Financial Services

SFLO
0.2%
CSB
27.5%

Utilities

SFLO
0.1%
CSB
21.3%

Real Estate

SFLO
0.1%
CSB

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SFLO vs. CSB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SFLO
SFLO Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
SFLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SFLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
SFLO Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
SFLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
SFLO Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

CSB
CSB Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
CSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSB Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
CSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSB Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SFLO vs. CSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF (SFLO) and VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SFLOCSBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.33

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.05

3.59

+2.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.29

10.77

+9.52

SFLO vs. CSB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SFLO Sharpe Ratio is 2.69, which is higher than the CSB Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SFLO and CSB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SFLO vs. CSB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SFLO drawdown since its inception was -26.63%, smaller than the maximum CSB drawdown of -42.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFLO and CSB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SFLOCSBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.63%

-42.07%

+15.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.80%

-7.18%

-0.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.00%

+1.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.15%

-7.05%

+2.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.32%

2.39%

-0.07%

Volatility

SFLO vs. CSB - Volatility Comparison

Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF (SFLO) has a higher volatility of 5.72% compared to VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB) at 3.69%. This indicates that SFLO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SFLOCSBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.72%

3.69%

+2.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.12%

8.92%

+4.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.58%

13.85%

+3.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.51%

18.59%

+1.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.51%

21.26%

-0.75%

SFLO vs. CSB - Expense Ratio Comparison

SFLO has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than CSB's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

SFLO vs. CSB - Dividend Comparison

SFLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%, less than CSB's 3.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSB
VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF
3.09%3.54%3.12%3.45%3.60%3.11%3.70%3.19%3.45%3.19%2.85%1.57%
SFLO
Victoryshares Small Cap Free Cash Flow ETF
0.71%1.04%1.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SFLO and CSB have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SFLO has higher volatility (5.72%) compared to CSB (3.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SFLO dropped -26.63% vs CSB's -42.07%.

On 1-year performance, SFLO leads with 47.01% vs 25.64% for CSB. On fees, CSB is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, CSB has been the lower-risk option at 3.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SFLO has performed better with a 47.01% return vs 25.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CSB is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for SFLO.

CSB has the higher dividend yield at 3.09%, compared with 0.71% for SFLO.

SFLO tracks Victory US Small Cap Free Cash Flow Index, while CSB tracks Nasdaq Victory U.S. Small Cap High Dividend 100 Volatility Weighted Index. They also come from different issuers: Victory and Crestview. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for SFLO and 0.35% for CSB.

SFLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SFLO and CSB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer